110
submitted 2 weeks ago by Espiritdescali to c/futurology
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 53 points 2 weeks ago

That's a silly title.

The sun doesn't produce a lot of energy because it is hot. The sun produces energy because it is big. All functional experimental fusion reactors operate at much higher temperatures than the sun.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Like 10x for takamak iirc

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 weeks ago

Its actually pretty "easy" to get hotter than the sun

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 13 points 2 weeks ago

An electrical arc is as hot as the surface of the sun.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Continue...

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Even if you get as hot as the core, you're not doing the same amount of fission unless you have similar pressure at the same time, and no you don't. It's a bit complicated by the fact the sun is mostly protium, and has low volumetric energy output as a result, but that's the gist.

[-] colourednumbers@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 weeks ago

Did it produce surplus energy?

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Shhh, we're talking about heat generation

[-] gaael@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

How many billionaires can be put inside at the same time? Asking for no reason.

[-] Mikufan@ani.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

Lets be real, gates is one of the few that did more good than harm.

[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Pshh no way, my armchair ranting about society has done way more than the Gate’s foundation eradicating polio for the last 40 years.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 6 points 2 weeks ago

I can understanding why he’s eradicating polio, too many horses get injured doing it. At least in water polio the horses suffer fewer leg injuries.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

And don't get us started on ricket! /s

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Raging hot take on Lemmy, but yeah, agreed. He was a bastard to get the money. All that money is going to, like, starving African kids, though. If I was him I'd do the same shit and sleep like a baby.

Meanwhile, Bezos builds dick rockets and nobody complains, because he keeps out of the headlines.

[-] Mikufan@ani.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Bezos wants to play dragon

Gates is definitely a good human, but nobody is without flaws. Bezos however wants to be evil. And then there is Musk, thinking he does good but actually is a clown that only causes inconveniences for everyone.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

There's ~2000 confirmed billionares on Earth. Some do philanthropy, some do evil, but most just enjoy being comically rich, like Jeff.

Honestly that sounds about like what the people I know would do. This is because it's all random chance, and they are an average group of people.

[-] Mikufan@ani.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Id say its still import how they got so rich, oil people for example are definitely on the evil scale. And thats the more important part, when when you get rich by destroying the world and using literal slave labor you are definitely evil. And this type of billionaire is more common than the good people.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well, sure, not in the ~2000 are guys like Putin or the Saudi royals. We all know they have way more than just a billion, but we can't prove it. Then again, there's a lot of mean people who are still poor. I've met some.

The math is sound. I'm always linking that thing because more people need to know.

[-] FullCommie@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Mikufan@ani.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

They are just humans like everyone else. Gates got rich without much abuse or problematic things, yeah his mom helped but when you have connections, you use them.

He definitely did more good than bad. And this whole shit about saying everyone from XY group is evil is just idiotic.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

he abused market position and squashed competitors for pretty much his entire time at the helm of microsoft.

[-] Mikufan@ani.social 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So every other company in that position did or would do. Shure its not ok, but the point still stands, more good than bad.

Btw, nowadays Microsoft contributes to FOSS projects.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

High probability OP would take a billion dollars, and still think themselves good. Lower than 50% that they would give it all away.

[-] Mikufan@ani.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Tbh, most humans on this planet would push a button saying "kill 10k random people and get 10 billion in gold" and they wouldn't even feel remorse. Gates definitely didn't kill 10k people.

Lower than 50%? Id say lower than 0,1% no sane individual would do that, you would have to be pretty stupid.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I mean, Gates is working on it. and Chuck Feeney did it in one shot. It would normally be significantly lower than 50%, but I gave OP the benefit of the doubt given their stated opinion of the wealthy.

[-] TheWilliamist@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

“…$30,000 a gram in 2022, almost as precious as a diamond.” 🤨

I though that was strange too. I'm sure you can get a gram of industrial diamond dust for much cheaper.

[-] frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Article says Shell invested $160m in Zap in 2022.

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

The smart ones are investing in renewables.

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
110 points (93.0% liked)

Futurology

1445 readers
44 users here now

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS