threelonmusketeers

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF

!steamedhams@lemmy.ca

 

The United States government has said it plans to endorse Tesla’s North American Charging Standard (NACS) as the federal EV charging standard. This decision aims to unify and streamline the nation’s EV charging infrastructure, promising greater compatibility, efficiency, and accessibility for EV users.

The relatively quick journey of NACS from Tesla’s proprietary design to a federal standard highlights the collaborative efforts between industry stakeholders and regulatory bodies. Independent standards organization SAE International recently finalized the NACS design under the designation J3400. By standardizing NACS, SAE has ensured it functions as an open standard, detached from Tesla’s exclusivity.

 

Although it’s been only less than a week since Tesla (TSLA) released its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) version 13 to early access beta testers, we’re witnessing a ton of testing already done on it.

According to FSD v13 testers, the system has improved even beyond what Tesla mentioned in the software’s release notes. FSD v13 has made Autopilot driving smoother multi-fold even compared to v12.

The current version with early access testers is FSD v13.2 (2024.39.10) which is a limited-release update. Tesla plans to roll out FSD v13.3 as a wide release but a solid timeline of this point-release update has yet to be announced by the tech automaker.

We should all aspire to be a bit more like Norway.

Call me Rivian if you want the complete list.

You are Rivian :)

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How many so far in the US alone? Phoenix, LA, San Francisco...? Then a few in China and Singapore? Any other countries?

Edit: Looks like the UAE as well.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm hitting an Instagram region lock. Anyone have a mirror?

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Interesting speculation on SLS and potential changes to the Artemis architecture:

Multiple sources have told Ars that the SLS rocket—which has long had staunch backing from Congress—is now on the chopping block. No final decisions have been made, but a tentative deal is in place with lawmakers to end the rocket in exchange for moving US Space Command to Huntsville, Alabama.

So how would NASA astronauts get to the Moon without the SLS rocket? Nothing is final, and the trade space is open. One possible scenario being discussed for future Artemis missions is to launch the Orion spacecraft on a New Glenn rocket into low-Earth orbit. There, it could dock with a Centaur upper stage that would launch on a Vulcan rocket. This Centaur stage would then boost Orion toward lunar orbit.

 

Eric Berger has published his thoughts on the matter.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Disappointing, but not a big surprise. At least they've finally shared some info on the heatshield issue:

Although the launch and lunar laps went well, the capsule returned with an excessively charred and eroded bottom heat shield, damaged from the heat of reentry. It took until recently for engineers to pinpoint the cause and come up with a plan.

NASA will use the Orion capsule with its original heat shield for the next flight with four astronauts, according to Nelson, but make changes to the reentry path at flight’s end. To rip off and replace the heat shield would have meant at least a full year’s delay and stalled the moon landing even further, officials said.

During the flight test, NASA had the capsule dip in and out of the atmosphere during reentry, and gases built up in the heat shield’s outer layer, officials said. That resulted in cracking and uneven shedding of the outer material.

When they say "NASA will use the Orion capsule with its original heat shield for the next flight", are they referring to the original design, or the actual original Artemis I heatshield which has been charred and eroded?

 

T-30 minutes until the return-to-flight launch of Vega-C, following the upper stage failure in 2022.

Launch thread is posted over at esa@feddit.nl: https://feddit.nl/post/24926770

The Mormons have satellites now?

Geoengineering of Earth's climate.

Seems like BYD are poised to dominate pretty much everywhere there aren't tariffs to prevent BYD domination.

 

A Chinese commercial launch firm launched its first upgraded Kuaizhou-1A rocket late Tuesday, adding to the country’s growing light-lift launch options.

The enhanced Kuaizhou-1A rocket lifted off at 11:46 p.m. Eastern, Dec. 3 (0546 UTC, Dec. 4) from Xichang Satellite Launch Center, southwest China. The solid rocket climbed rapidly into blue skies above the spaceport. Commercial space launch firm Expace announced launch success once it inserted its single satellite payload into its preset orbit.

The payload was announced to be Haishao-1, also referred to as CAS Satellite-8. It is described as a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) remote sensing satellite. Haishao-1 can perform on-board imaging and extract marine dynamic information, offering broad application prospects.

The upgraded Kuaizhou-1A appears to have extended first and second stages, and a payload fairing extended from 1.4 to 1.8 meters. Its payload capacity to low Earth orbit (LEO) is increased from 300 kilograms to 450 kg. Its sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) capacity to 700 km altitude is increased from 200 kg to over 300 kg.

SpaceNews article

NextSpaceflight

view more: next ›