sh.itjust.works Main Community

8251 readers

152 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

manifex@sh.itjust.works

biela@sh.itjust.works

imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works

2 Instances are being used for coordinated vote manipulation, and should be defederated. chinese.lol lemmy.doesnotexist.club (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 5 months ago by threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://hackertalks.com/post/8713785

The instances being used are

lemmy.doesnotexist.club

chinese.lol

Here is an example of the coordinated downvoting https://hackertalks.com/post/8692093

Of course its a controversial user who got someone angry enough to automated downvoting !DonaldJMusk@lemmy.today

But you can see every post they make gets 53ish downvotes from these two instances, plus some organic ones after a few hours.

Current downvoting Accounts
bot-list
LightIsland@chinese.lol MagnificentRow@chinese.lol FondKnowledge@chinese.lol SillyTowel95@chinese.lol HelplessDear@chinese.lol SomberBrain@chinese.lol InexperiencedCloset@chinese.lol NecessaryPerson11@chinese.lol ClosedEmployment@chinese.lol CoarseHair420@chinese.lol BurlyChampionship49@chinese.lol ZigzagNatural@chinese.lol QuestionableDirt@chinese.lol ProudDeparture@lemmy.doesnotexist.club VigilantExtension17@lemmy.today JoyousDouble@chinese.lol UnitedPatience@chinese.lol MajesticArea@lemmy.doesnotexist.club SinfulConference@chinese.lol MoralDivide96@chinese.lol LeadingCarry65@chinese.lol FrillyOpinion38@lemmy.doesnotexist.club LimitedDiscount49@lemmy.doesnotexist.club ForkedScreen@chinese.lol MediumChemistry13@chinese.lol xXxLawfulGrassxXx@lemmy.doesnotexist.club VisibleSentence@chinese.lol AcidicLawyer90@lemmy.doesnotexist.club PriceySink14@lemmy.doesnotexist.club ExcellentBeach@chinese.lol VivaciousNews@lemmy.doesnotexist.club LankyIndependent32@lemmy.doesnotexist.club SpeedyFault@chinese.lol ConcreteHall89@lemmy.doesnotexist.club WorthyPoint12@lemmy.doesnotexist.club SurprisedAdult99@chinese.lol FlashyCrack@lemmy.doesnotexist.club MasculineBeing@chinese.lol RichWeird@lemmy.doesnotexist.club DryCash97@lemmy.doesnotexist.club AuthorizedChair@chinese.lol SlimKiss@lemmy.doesnotexist.club AromaticRoof78@lemmy.doesnotexist.club BewitchedInterview@lemmy.doesnotexist.club ImaginaryDraw@lemmy.doesnotexist.club PertinentGround@chinese.lol SinfulAssumption@lemmy.doesnotexist.club AwkwardAnybody30@lemmy.doesnotexist.club UnwillingRestaurant@lemmy.doesnotexist.club InsubstantialOven@lemmy.doesnotexist.club

A individual user airing their personal biases and manipulating lemmy isn't good for the community, regardless of how you feel about their target. This is a really bad thing (tm)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

threelonmuskteers whats up with this? https://lemmy.world/post/35942590?scrollToComments=true

And before you say its not relevant, I question your presence on lemmy at all if this is how you participate. Especially as on this topic you go on about the "good for the community".
Do you have an explanation for this behavior?

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago (3 children)

on this topic you go on about the “good for the community”

Those are technically @jet@hackertalks.com's words, not mine, but I agree with them and thought it worth crossposting.

Do you have an explanation for this behavior?

In one specific community, I'm experimenting with the moderation policy for niche communities, also described by @jet@hackertalks.com. Feel free to have a read through; let me know if you have any further questions.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why are we necroing 5 month old posts to ask questions about a current post?

I question your presence on lemmy at all if this is how you participate. Especially as on this topic you go on about the “good for the community”. Do you have an explanation for this behavior?

This is rather authoritarian.....

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Did you intent to reply to me or to the parent comment?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 5 days ago

I intended to reply to you, I'm just godsmacked by the parent comment.