Tinidril

joined 2 years ago
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Now it's time for the "vote blue no matter who" crowd to put up or shut up. So far, party loyalty doesn't seem very important to a lot of the establishment.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (13 children)

So was Obama, who led us directly to Trump. At some point, Democrats have to actually stand for something more than mere competence and being the lesser evil.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 8 points 2 months ago

Voters vote in primaries too you know. Biden beat Bernie almost entirely on a myth that he was the most electable. That shit has to go, and Rachel Maddow and Chris Cuomo aren't going to do that for us.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also, her interview answer about not doing anything different from the Biden administration was political malpractice of the first order.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If "best" means technically proficient, then sure. He does the politician thing better than any other establishment Democrats I can think of. If "best" means good for the country, then I have some notes. Obama was the same kind of character, and Trump was the result. I'm not sure I want to go down the highly charismatic Wall Street bitch route again.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

Thus my note about "social media and AI mass surveillance". What makes insurgency so effective is the enemy of the occupier could be anyone.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The US lost in both Vietnam and Afghanistan because occupation is hard. There isn't an army on the planet that can even come close to taking on the US military in open combat, but insurgencies are a completely different animal.

Social media and AI mass surveillance might make a difference, but I kinda doubt it.

I don't think this is where we are headed, but it wouldn't be an automatic win for the military. Unfortunately, the people who end up in charge after an uprising usually end up being worse than the people they replace.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As a hopelessly straight American, I second the motion.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social -1 points 2 months ago

It wasn't rigged. Even if it were rigged, it should never have been close enough to be rigged, but it wasn't rigged. If the DNC waited to say it was rigged, they are still waiting because they haven't said they think it's rigged, but their not waiting, because it wasn't rigged.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

They really thought she'd be worse?

For the love of God, please stop spreading this mode of thinking. Elections are won by enthusiasm, not an intellectual weighing of the pros and cons of each. This is the model Democrats have used for decades that got us here. Being the lesser evil is not a solid campaign strategy. The greater evil will always get more attention, and therefore enthusiasm.

I don't think this is an exclusively American thing. Did Brits really think brexit was a good idea?

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 2 months ago

They might be the source, but a lot of Catholics have started imitating them. They are almost leading the pack now with Opus Dei. The new age "law of attraction" bullshit is also just a repackaging of the "prosperity gospel" that so many evangelical charlatans use to fleece their flocks.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 21 points 2 months ago

Months. Did you somehow miss black lives matter? The rapid growth of the prison industrial complex? This is just the explosive conclusion to a pattern that was well underway long before Trump.

view more: ‹ prev next ›