I'm looking for the sarcasm tag and getting genuinely curious.
Tinidril
I agree completely. I also won't say there isn't a worst case scenario where we end up looking a whole lot like Russia does right now for a good long time. I think it looks like we are dodging that path, but I don't think we've made it yet.
Right or not, I don't think anything is written in stone yet. I don't think anybody has a reason to feel comfortable right now. Not the fascists, not the Democratic establishment, and certainly not progressives.
In the case of the Democratic establishment, this is exactly the meaning they intend to project. They just want to be able to deny it at the same time while getting well meaning normies to unthinkingly repeat the disparaging rhetoric against progressives.
Here's a great primer to some of their other vocabulary of choice.
Only Obama has come close to a real endorsement, and none came in when they might have mattered, Has Jefferies even worked up the courage to endorse him by name yet, or is it still just "the Democratic candidate" LOL?
Not only did they give us Trump 2, they are trying to give us Trump 3 right now. Mamdani is going to win NY and Democrats are doing everything they can to signal that if Trump invades as he is threatening that they won't have his back.
Notice too how Trump is reacting so much differently to Mamdani than other Democrats. Mamdani scares him. Establishment Democrats don't. Progressives scare him. Left populists scare him. Out of touch corporate Democrats are losers.
The Democratic establishment has still failed to line up and support Mamdani in NY, so there isn't going to be much patience on the left for hearing about what Democratic "voters" don't get. The voters aren't the source of the problem.
Anyone who uses the phrase "purity test" has completely failed to grasp the situation. It has nothing to do with purity tests, and the phrase is itself a cultural smear used by establishment Democrats against progressives.
There is no minor nitpicking going on of one issue here or there. There is a gaping divide in the party between the corporate establishment and the vast majority of the Democratic base.
Someone has to serve the food and clean the golden toilets.
Not right now we shouldn't. Right now, we lose. A lot can be done with a combination of passive resistance, the courts, and (yes) electoral politics. Meanwhile, a cultural backlash against the right is building fast. The fascists really are racing the clock to consolidate power, and it doesn't look like they are gaining ground fast enough.
I'm not saying it's a secret, but it's not exactly stuff the media is gonna be covering now, is it?
Seems way too arbitrary to set it so high, then have a flat cutoff. I much prefer the idea of starting lower and adjusting the rate up on a curve.