I'm guessing if you were going to be able to travel at Mach 16, an entirely new type of airplane architecture, built with new types of material is going to be needed.
Yes, I think that is what the problem is here. Some people used to have the idea that more scaling would be enough for reasoning to appear, but that hasn't happened.
More bad news for investors pouring hundreds of billions into AI companies like OpenAI, and wishing and hoping for moats.
Global banks will cut as many as 200,000 jobs in the next three to five years as artificial intelligence encroaches on tasks currently carried out by human workers, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.
I wonder when all this will become a major issue for voters in developed countries?
Chinese space technology tends to get very under reported in western media, but this guy is an excellent source.
30% of global electricity was from renewables in 2024. It's already cheaper than most other sources, and keeps getting cheaper.
I've always wondered, if decades in the future, a terrorist attack might occur by somebody nudging an asteroid towards Earth. I'm not the only person thinking this, it was a major plot point in the TV show 'The Expanse'.
I wonder if fusion powers true usefulness will be when humans are in space? Because you are correct in saying renewables will probably be enough to supply all our needs and more by the 2030s.
We are used to the idea of drugs being recreationally misused, I wonder will that ever happen to tech like this?
That behavior among "advanced" species has always been forward as one solution to the Fermi Paradox.
I am no expert in any of this, but why do you think it couldn't work at scale? This company says their tech has advantages in cheapness and efficiency over existing solutions. What is it about what they are doing that will not scale?
I believe so. Geely are Chinese. Even with tariffs, I suspect its Chinese EVs that are going to dominate in robotaxis.