I, for one, welcome our new super-intelligent rodent overlords
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
8 points (75.0% liked)
Futurology
3172 readers
114 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
We think we'll turn ourselves into superhumans with gene editing, and worry about the societal implications and potential uses for evil.
But, the world is dumb. I suspect we'll actually turn ourselves into figurative pugs or Gros Michel bananas given the chance.
New technology will not solve issues unless we have the political will to ensure it will help everyone.
Such technology is worthless or potentially actively harmful until we deal with the social disasters currently occurring.
Or, we could just provide everyone with a good education.
That's very ignorant of basic biology. You should read the citations here: https://maximiliankohler.blogspot.com/2020/08/why-im-voting-for-one-of-two-senile-old.html
Maybe you can link them directly so I don't have to sift through your shitty blog? At a glance, if your argument is that we should also have initiatives to increase the health of everybody, than I agree, and don't need some smug asshole putting words in my mouth.
If everyone gains 30 IQ points, nobody gains 30 IQ points. That's how indices work.
I mean, sure...
They readjust 100 once drift becomes noticable and it's not the average result anymore.
But an IQ tests are still quantifiable and a hypothetical where everyone would score 30 points higher on the current scale is still worthwhile.
Watch the movie Gattaca, there's your answer. Basically a two-class society between richt edited people and poor natural-born people who would be even more disadvantaged.
IQ tests are a scam and are rooted in Eugenics. They are also heavily skewed when the takers are poor and malnourished.
People arent born "stupid". They lack access to health and education.
When getting on your personal yacht, how many attendees are needed?
If we could magically snap our collective fingers and everyone become smarter? Sure, probably good for society.
But what's definitely incredibly toxic for society would be to pay-wall these sort of advances to the rich, creating a semi-human racial offshoot being constantly told that they are better, smarter and wealthier than any other human. Only new flavors of racism, apartheid and ethnic cleanings follow.
That is absolutely what would happen.
The news industry would collapse overnight as their entire customer base suddenly realizes "Hey! This is all just alarmist BS and straight up lies! Look at this, the headline isn't even CLOSE to depicting the reality of the situation. You'd have to be a complete fucking idiot to fall for this crap!"
Would this be the start of the eugenics wars?
This widespread, and seemingly sole focus on genes is ignorant.
Kind of whataboutism from my side... But won't healthy (and enough) food for kids, education and opportunities provide an IQ boost? I guess we could do a noticeable increase if we wanted...
way fewer kids till wealth inequality was reduced to reasonable levels.
If everybody could read and understand Marx, people would seize the means of production.
I am not clever enough to know if they would still be exploited by an elite. The way investment bankers spend their bonuses makes me think so.
what could possibly go wrong
Flowers for Algernon
Curing neurological diseases isn't the same as bumping up IQ.
But 30 points is fucking huge...
Like, that's the difference between dead center "average" and a legal intellectual disability.
Because 30 points is where communication becomes hindered.
So if everyone got a 30 point bump, it would change absolutely nothing. The people being manipulated would be 30 points smarter, but so would the people manipulating them.
IQ just isn't a big deal, that's why they dropped the threshold for "genius" from 160 to 120 and added things like motivation and drive.
What really matters is the difference between people