this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
578 points (99.0% liked)

News

29346 readers
3360 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A man checked out 100 books from Beachwood Library in Beachwood, Ohio, covering Jewish history, African-American history, and LGBTQ topics, and later posted social media videos showing the books with captions referencing “cleansing” libraries before burning them.

Princeton University’s Bridging Divides Initiative alerted the library about the posts.

The books were worth about $1,700. Since they are not overdue, the library will bill the man later.

Police say the matter is civil unless he fails to pay. He is now banned from returning to the library.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

He'll just burn it. Got to hit him with it...

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This has been happening for a while... but I still remember the not too long ago when many conservatives were talking about how all libs were book burning Nazis. Never saw a lib burn a book, but they are, and doing it far more often and with far greater volume.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Should justice be served, the irony is that this man will end up paying for 100 brand new books on civil rights and LGBT topics.

Oh wait... Ohio? Nevermind, not holding my breath...

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

Ohio let's you check out 100 books at a time?

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 88 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

The books were worth about $1,700. Since they are not overdue, the library will bill the man later.

Police informed CCPL that, because a contract was entered when the books were borrowed, failure to return or pay for the books would become a civil matter turned over to the city prosecutor.

Should the man return to the Beachwood Library, he will be banned from the property.

Shoutout to libraries. Absolute diamonds in the rough. Burn books? Whatever, people don't return books all the time. When they're overdue, here's the bill, next!

We don't live in the age of books anymore. Shit like this is ignorant and fascist but also just symbolic. Libraries are cornerstones of a free society, but the physical paper itself isn't nearly as important anymore. It's hilariously replaceable.

I want the list of books. "Banned" and "burned" books go hard as hell. Maybe even files for the m@tes to get 'em all at once. The modern age can undo all this idiot's work with a single link.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The books were worth about $1,700. Since they are not overdue, the library will bill the man later.

honestly that's hilarious as fuck 😂

[–] sfled@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Librarians are pretty chill, unless you're a loud talker hehe

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Except that librarian in the disc world books. He would probably rip some arms off.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 13 points 2 days ago

We don’t live in the age of books anymore.

We don't, but there's problems with only relying on electronic information that can be swapped out at any time. Don't have to burn the information when you can make it say whatever you want.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

"Banned" and "burned" books go hard as hell

Every library I've been to in the last 5 years has had a poster of "banned books" specifically to advertise them because people (especially teenagers) love that shit.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

He doesn't want us to read those book, by the same logic, would it be OK to cut off that mans genitalia because we don't want him to reproduce?

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago

Same as it ever was.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 178 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"A man"

This person has destroyed public property. Whether or not he pays, his name should be made public. People who know him should know what kind of person he is. His employer should know who they have hired. His employer's customers should know who they are dealing with.

This is not normal behavior. This person is a sociopath and society needs to know who he is.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 78 points 3 days ago

Agreed. He didn't have any problems posting it to social media. There's no reason not to include his identity in the article. Even if he posted under a pseudonym, that should still be included.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is not normal behavior. This person is a sociopath and society needs to know who he is.

I wish people would stop throwing clinical terms around like this. Socio/psychopathy is a complicated psychiatric disorder with distinct behavioral and psychological markers, not a synonym for “evil.”

Sadly, you don’t need a psychiatric disorder to engage in despicable behavior. “Normal” people are quite capable of being racist, sexist douchebags, and most racist, sexist douchebags are not mentally ill. Bigotry is a product of culture, not abnormal psychology.

[–] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

I think the correct clinical diagnosis in his case is "flaming asshole"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 42 points 2 days ago

"Dort wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man auch am Ende Menschen." - Heinrich Heine

Book burners have never once been on the right side of history.

[–] greybeard@lemm.ee 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In Ohio felony theft is over $1000.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 134 points 3 days ago (4 children)

from the library's perspective this couldn't be simpler. they have an exact list of which books to replace and who to charge for the balance.

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 76 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Yeah but in the current climate I'm worried he's going to encourage other bigots to be similarly destructive, and that shithead nazis will come to his defense and try to normalize it.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

well of course, I agree. but the library can't control that; they're just trying to hold on and survive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

Sending a bill is one thing; collecting on it is another. As it stands now, the library is out $1700 and those books aren't necessarily getting replaced soon (or if they are, something else is not getting done instead).

An example needs to be made so that this tactic doesn't spread.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If I were dictator I would announce a new LGBTQ and African American wing of the library and dedicate it to him, with a placard showing his payment to the library for the books he has to pay back, but he doesn’t deserve to have his name anywhere…

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

I think having his name represented on something in which he hates is absolutely deserved and hilarious.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

How is that not criminal destruction of property? Some of those books may not even be replaceable. 😠 You could also say criminal intimidation of protected minority groups by an obviously targeted political act.

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because the man was legally in possession of them at the time. It's the same reason that you have to go through a tedious process to have your car reported stolen if you let someone borrow it and don't bring it back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 94 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Good thing it wasn't a Tesla, then "the man" would be doxxed by mainstream media outlets, he'd be tried as a terrorist, and the cops would have been deep into investigations before the sun came up.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 48 points 3 days ago (5 children)

He’s aware that the whole book burning thing was something that the German Nazis, the one various nations had a war with, did, yeah?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Yes. These people know exactly what they're doing.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 26 points 2 days ago

These people think the only bad thing that the Nazis did was lose. They think the Nazis were too soft, and they intend to me much stronger this time around.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

They are well aware. They are following the same playbook.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 63 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Police say the matter is civil unless he fails to pay. He is now banned from returning to the library.

Pretty sure Destruction of Public Property is a crime in most jurisdictions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThraawnSolo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wait...is this for real?...Typically there is a limit to how many books you can check out...

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 days ago (6 children)

At my library, that limit IS 100 books.

My kid regularly has ~60 books checked out. It's kind of a problem lol

[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago

But what an awesome problem to have!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

This is the mentality of MAGA. SMH

[–] troybot@midwest.social 54 points 3 days ago

Something this article doesn't mention is that the population of Beachwood is predominantly Jewish, so this was very targeted

[–] antithetical@lemmy.deedium.nl 36 points 3 days ago

What a horrible human being. If destroying books or repressing knowledge is part of your dogma you are on the wrong side of history.

[–] Wazowski@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

republicans are swine.

[–] DarkShaggy@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's almost more shocking that the library allowed to check out all those books. There can't be a legitimate reason to do so, even if he said he needed to reference them all for a thesis or something like that

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

Sounds like a hate crime to me.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Take away his library card!

[–] kerntucky@infosec.pub 12 points 2 days ago

"He is now banned from returning to the library."

It's in the article.

load more comments
view more: next ›