chaosCruiser

joined 1 year ago
[–] chaosCruiser 37 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Masked ICE Gestapo raiding a …

The wording in these articles is getting spicier every day.

[–] chaosCruiser 1 points 21 hours ago

That's a very disturbing symmetry...

[–] chaosCruiser 42 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Is America trying to replicate the Arab spring? If so, the next steps can get very messy. Just look what happened in Syria.

[–] chaosCruiser 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Food additives. People are afraid of scary chemical names, but hiding them behind numbers doesn’t really help much. It just makes the ingredient list shorter.

[–] chaosCruiser 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Those who need to know the pH value, might be a small minority, just like people with specific allergies. The size of the group doesn’t seem to be a deciding factor in these things. As long as the information benefits someone, it makes sense to include it.

On the other hand, delusional and paranoid people will always find a way to make stupid decisions. They are already using e-codes for that purpose, so I think we can just ignore them in this case.

[–] chaosCruiser 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You could also fall out of a window, or mysteriously disappear in the middle of the night. There are options you know.

[–] chaosCruiser 3 points 1 day ago

It's a matter of perspective, and the same goes for some of the other points too. It really matters what is being subverted.

[–] chaosCruiser 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You could look at it from the perspective of the moral foundations.

  • Care/harm✅
  • Fairness/cheating✅
  • Loyalty?/betrayal?
  • Authority?/subversion?
  • Sanctity?/degradation?
  • Liberty/oppression✅

Only about half of these are clear to me. I think Trump needs to step up his game if he wants to get to the worst outcome possible.

[–] chaosCruiser 1 points 2 days ago

Wow, those are some pretty big numbers! About 10x bigger than what I was thinking. I knew these things can get pretty weird, but this is just absolutely wild. When expectations fly that high, the crash can be all the more spectacular.

When you notice that your free account can’t do much, that’s a sign that OpenAI is beginning to run out of money. When that happens, the competitors will be ready to welcome all the users who didn’t feel like paying OpenAI.

[–] chaosCruiser 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's a very good point. Actually, video hosting services also suffer from a similar problem, and that's one of the main reasons why it's so hard to compete with YouTube. Since there are so many LLM services out there at the moment, it makes me think that there must be a completely ridiculous amount of investor money floating around there. Doesn't sound like a sustainable situation to me.

Apparently, the companies are hoping that everyone gets so hooked on LLMs that they have no choice but to pay up when the inevitable tsunami of enshittification hits us.

[–] chaosCruiser 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

As long as they can convince investors of potential future revenue, they will be just fine. In the growth stage, companies don’t have to be profitable because the investors will cover the expenses. Being profitable becomes a high priority only when you run out of series F money, and the next investors can’t borrow another 700 million. It’s a combination of having low interest rates and convincing arguments.

BTW I don’t think this is a good way to run a company, but many founders and investors clearly disagree with me.

[–] chaosCruiser 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Probably not going to go belly-up in a while, but the enshittification cycle still applies. At the moment, investors are pouring billions into the AI business, and as a result, companies can offer services for free while only gently nudging users towards the paid tiers.

When the interest rates rise during the next recession, investors won’t have access to money any more. Then, the previously constant stream of money dries up, AI companies start cutting what the free tier has, and people start complaining about enshittification. During that period, the paid tiers also get restructured to squeeze more money out of the paying customers. That hasn’t happened yet, but eventually it will. Just keep an eye on those interest rates.

 

As LLMs become the go-to for quick answers, fewer people are posting questions on forums or social media. This shift could make online searches less fruitful in the future, with fewer discussions and solutions available publicly. Imagine troubleshooting a tech issue and finding nothing online because everyone else asked an LLM instead. You do the same, but the LLM only knows the manual, offering no further help. Stuck, you contact tech support, wait weeks for a reply, and the cycle continues—no new training data for LLMs or new pages for search engines to index. Could this lead to a future where both search results and LLMs are less effective?

 

Asking for a friend.

view more: next ›