this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
972 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

27264 readers
511 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

At least copilot only does shit when you click on it, even if it is useless.

Unlike Google, which wastes tons of electric and water every single search without the users consent. That is a lot more damaging to society than whatever Microsoft does.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I'm blown away that they actually named it copilot. I would have thought they'd name it something stupid like "my computer* or "xbox" or "me".

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

Or ActiveAzure

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 130 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I love how accurate this image is. As they hammer more the structure becomes more and more unstable.

I've noticed the AI search suggestions from Bing and Google are just becoming more and more inaccurate as they feed off themselves. I can't even imagine what it's doing to systems we can't see.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

They don’t feed from each other. AI is trained with data from the before times. They only use good old regular search engine algos to get context data.
Simplicated:
Prompt->analyze->genereate search terms->analyse search results->generate response

They just make way more loops in real scenarios and even more if you let it “think longer”

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago

I looked for some troubleshooting for my podcast player, and was really mistrustful of the AI summary, but it was right. But of course the solution was pulled from a forum, so could easily have been from a different product, or an outdated version. The last thing I looked for gave a well out dated answer for fingerprint readers under Linux

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Everything is fine. It will become god and fix all our problems any second now, and if you say that's mathematically impossible you're just a hater.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

i mean, we have the solutions to a lot of problems already

traffic? public trains

hunger? just like, feed people

global warming? reduce fossil fuel usage and stop poisoning the oceans

homeless? literally so many empty homes, put people in them???

and we've had many smart people create step by step plans for all of these!

the thing is... i guess rich people want a solution that doesn't involve them paying for something that's good not just for them but for others? so all those plans fail at step 1 - have empathy

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"We will create God then ask him for money."

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

"It doesn't matter that we are burning 1 trillion dollars with no pat to revenue, because we will create God and it will make money meaningless."

"Also, it will cure cancer and solve Global Warming. I know dumb people like you that can't even get a trillion dollars to burn care about those things.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

TIL Catholics invented AI

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I mean, nitpick, but if you blamed mathematics you actually would be. The observation that AI/LLMs are highly unreliable and don't appear to be getting any better is empirical.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

noai.duckduckgo my beloved, glad that's the best free option rn (although I think Kagi is getting popular too, but that's paid).

[–] Uri@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago

Kagi pays yandex for image search ewww. Use a searxng instance and thank me later. Seriously give it a try

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] naught101@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Also it's building on top of existing fragility (the thin pillar below), and only making it worse

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not just MS though, right?

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

MS is especially egregious about it.

They're planning the next iteration of Windows to be primarily AI-driven - as in, the AI runs things for you.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

AI ruins things for you

FTFY

well Microsoft saaaaaays that, but they also said in the same video that they'd achieve "Computing in the realm of Quantum" so I predict multiple shitty interface updates and a few new pop-ups.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Most developers in general.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏 Developers 👏

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a developer this has not been my experience, we all hate it with the fiery passion of a thousand suns.

My former boss fucking loved it though, but he was a PM not a dev.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

I guess that last sentence sums it up well.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

More like C Level people that force devs to make this crap

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There are job postings that not only actively encourage it as part of the job description but ask that you be enthusiastic about it

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Meanwhile that little block at the bottom is still doing its best to keep it all together. For now.

[–] zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago

could it be the foss and publicly fund research and training I wonder

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

ImageMagik is referenced in the alt text of the original comic Dependencymobile version

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikoz@programming.dev 40 points 1 week ago

It will collapse due to the AI slop(e)

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 5 days ago

Too many people identified the monitor as the source of their frustration, when really it was the box on which it sat that was to blame

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Functional programmers when the content of their PC's memory change (no longer safe, and no longer upholds functional programming paradigms):

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

System76 2k PC

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 16 points 1 week ago

Love the person in the background getting up, looking over and just sitting back down again like Greg sledgehammering his monitor to pieces is nothing extraordinary

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are putting it into washing machines these days.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Oh good catch! How astute of you! Of course I should have added detergent before running the cycle!"

[–] M137@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

User: Add enough detergent for this weight of clothes.

Washing machine AI: OK, I have added the correct amount for you, ready to start the wash.

User: You only added fabric softener, I need you to add detergent. Please weigh the clothes and add the detergent based on that weight.

Washing machine AI: Ah, I see what you mean. I have now weighed the clothes and added the needed amount of detergent.

User: you just added more fabric softener. Do not add any more of that, I only need detergent. Please, add detergent.

Washing machine AI: I'm sorry, I misunderstood you before. I have now made sure to add detergent.

User: you added more fabric softener....

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Technology Connections in his recent video (or was it on his second channel?) points or that since dishwashers had only six functions, all of which run when given line voltage, and case running when depowered, anyone with Arduino and some relays could make a new control board for a dishwasher pretty easily, to make programs that way better. Laundry machines are similar but simpler, if they ever get that bad, they'll be easy to lobotomise

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

See, the solution is just to not use softener. Haven't used it in a decade, haven't missed it either.

Though the AI might come up with a different fuckup.

[–] Quantenteilchen@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry, I cannot add any detergent because my detergent sensor is telling me the tray is empty.

load more comments (1 replies)

"...but I ignored your specific instructions and instead ran the washing machine for 15 hours. That was very wasteful of me, and you're right that was not what I was instructed to do, but I did it anyways."

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

More like doing a big sloppy crap of AI on top of everything.

load more comments
view more: next ›