this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
299 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

17058 readers
562 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 52 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 76 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] SW42@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Teflon is just the brand name. I believe it’s called Polytetrafluorethylene, thus ending in ne :)

[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 41 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

SW42 shall forever be remembered a hero, who saved the world from a dark path

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Known also as PFAS or forever chemicals

[–] Tja@programming.dev 26 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Teflon itself is quite good, getting it to stick to places is the problem.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 42 points 2 months ago (14 children)

Quite good, if you avoid the fact it's literally everywhere including the atmosphere, doesn't break down, and causes cancer. But who cares about such little things like cancer causing rain...

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Again, that's from getting it to stick to things. The smaller PTFE chemicals that make it possible to suspend Teflon in water are the problem.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Teflon is the brand name for for the chemical Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Making PTFE requires PFAS, which are the toxic part. Think of PFAS as little bits of chain varying lengths that get strung together to make the larger PTFE molecule.

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous." PFAS contaminated water being released to the environment is an unavoidable by produce of making Teflon. You can only make Teflon as a solid without suspending the PFAS in water first.

Here's a pretty good video about the history, manufacturing process, and toxicity.

https://youtu.be/SC2eSujzrUY

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

There is one important note: you won't get cancer from the Teflon in your pans. You get it from the PFAS used to produce the pans. This means you don't have to throw out all your pans, as if they were made from lead and asbestos. Just make sure not to buy new ones with Teflon.

[–] ExFed@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous."

I didn't read it that way at all. Their argument sounds more like "there's nuance that you're glossing over."

It seems that we all agree PFAS are generally nasty chemicals, some worse than others. Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) is just one of the "nicer" ones.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can't make teflon without the PFAS though. It's like saying AIDS is completely different than HIV

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

no it's more like saying "desalinated water is fine, it's the brine that's problematic."

which is true.

and the same goes for teflon:

the PFAS are toxic, not teflon itself.

glossing over that distinction is disingenuous...

yes, you can't make one without the other, true, but the end product is not toxic. that's an important difference you can't just ignore in order to say teflon is toxic, because a requisite material in (cheap) production is toxic.

because that's like saying desalinated water is toxic, just because brine is toxic..which is obviously ridiculous.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

ie if you already have a teflon thing, that teflon is non-toxic and there’s no point to just throw it out… avoid new things if possible because they byproducts are harmful, but disposing of existing product is unhelpful

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

It's also what makes it cheap. Making Teflon other ways is much more expensive.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's releasing a high amount of micro and nano plastics, and those are linked to different health issues including cancer.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724027232

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Teflon itself is inert, but it's also not needed to avoid that food sticks in a pan. In a good prepared Steel pan food sticks less than in a Teflon pan and is way more resistant to damages. The food sticks in the pan, if you don't wait to add the food until it's heated enough, not for other reasons, mistake often don by normal users. Professional cooks never use Teflon pans.

Preparing a Steel pan non-stick

  • Clean the pan after buy it
  • Heat the pan on the kitchen
  • Add some oil and heat somewhat more until it smoke
  • After this, wait until i's cold enough and distribute and eliminate the oil film over the whole surface with an kitchen paper.
  • Done

After this, to fry something, add a little oil and wait until the oil has enough heat (test with the handle of a wood spoon, if it forms little bubbles on it in the oil, the temperature is OK), to add the food. It will never stick this way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXEt-fhyCis

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago

Teflon itself is inert

About that

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

Steel/iron > teflon for sure though.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In Denmark there was until very recently a factory doing something with teflon. That shit got launched out the chimney and just rained down everywhere.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlordaMan@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah, Dupont invoiced everyone.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 2 months ago

monsanto tactics

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah, every factory that does "something" with Teflon probably wants to stick it to things, which are the problematic chemicals, not Teflon itself.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

In the same way Asbestos is a great material, just one small problem

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Asbestos makes for a great cigarette filter material, though.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago

It is certainly... impactful for your lungs.

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago

We are too weak for the miracle of asbestos.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Asbestos itself is toxic. Teflon is inert.

[–] anti_antidote@lemmy.zip 51 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

made from crayfish

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nylon? To many things end with on.

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

funnily enough, that is a DuPont thing, but hasn't find its way into everyone's blood yet.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

that is a DuPont thing, but hasn't find its way into everyone's blood yet.

Umm.. I've some bad news for you.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024003374

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 11 points 2 months ago

welp, guess this meme is even more true then.

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, that's why I chose it haha.

Edit: I was just being salty in my original comment due to the meme being to vague and me being a chemist.

I'm not from the states but actually got to visit the DuPont plant that did nylon and Lycra. Also saw the river that once changed colour or something due to waste chemicals? I can't remember the story.

Regardless, I in no way support DuPont or any other company that is responsible for such damages as they have caused.

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're just not trying hard enough, it took me a while but i managed to jam it in there (very little room in my veins because of all the microplastics)

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Now do it with Lycra.

[–] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Except that they used the chemicals that do find their way into everyone's blood to make nylon. So it tangentially fits the meme.

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Lethal when breathed in.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

canceron should have been a dead giveaway

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does Teflon explain MAGA?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Nah, I'm betting on plain old lead.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago

zyklon B?,mustard gas.

load more comments
view more: next ›