this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
298 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

16412 readers
2688 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 76 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] SW42@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Teflon is just the brand name. I believe it’s called Polytetrafluorethylene, thus ending in ne :)

[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

SW42 shall forever be remembered a hero, who saved the world from a dark path

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Known also as PFAS or forever chemicals

[–] Tja@programming.dev 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Teflon itself is quite good, getting it to stick to places is the problem.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 41 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Quite good, if you avoid the fact it's literally everywhere including the atmosphere, doesn't break down, and causes cancer. But who cares about such little things like cancer causing rain...

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Again, that's from getting it to stick to things. The smaller PTFE chemicals that make it possible to suspend Teflon in water are the problem.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Teflon is the brand name for for the chemical Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Making PTFE requires PFAS, which are the toxic part. Think of PFAS as little bits of chain varying lengths that get strung together to make the larger PTFE molecule.

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous." PFAS contaminated water being released to the environment is an unavoidable by produce of making Teflon. You can only make Teflon as a solid without suspending the PFAS in water first.

Here's a pretty good video about the history, manufacturing process, and toxicity.

https://youtu.be/SC2eSujzrUY

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

There is one important note: you won't get cancer from the Teflon in your pans. You get it from the PFAS used to produce the pans. This means you don't have to throw out all your pans, as if they were made from lead and asbestos. Just make sure not to buy new ones with Teflon.

[–] ExFed@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The argument you're making sounds similar to something like "Fossil Fuels are safe, it's just the CO2 that's dangerous."

I didn't read it that way at all. Their argument sounds more like "there's nuance that you're glossing over."

It seems that we all agree PFAS are generally nasty chemicals, some worse than others. Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) is just one of the "nicer" ones.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can't make teflon without the PFAS though. It's like saying AIDS is completely different than HIV

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

no it's more like saying "desalinated water is fine, it's the brine that's problematic."

which is true.

and the same goes for teflon:

the PFAS are toxic, not teflon itself.

glossing over that distinction is disingenuous...

yes, you can't make one without the other, true, but the end product is not toxic. that's an important difference you can't just ignore in order to say teflon is toxic, because a requisite material in (cheap) production is toxic.

because that's like saying desalinated water is toxic, just because brine is toxic..which is obviously ridiculous.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

ie if you already have a teflon thing, that teflon is non-toxic and there’s no point to just throw it out… avoid new things if possible because they byproducts are harmful, but disposing of existing product is unhelpful

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

ie if you already have a teflon thing, that teflon is non-toxic and there’s no point to just throw it out… avoid new things if possible because they byproducts are harmful, but disposing of existing product is unhelpful

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

It's also what makes it cheap. Making Teflon other ways is much more expensive.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's releasing a high amount of micro and nano plastics, and those are linked to different health issues including cancer.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724027232

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Teflon itself is inert, but it's also not needed to avoid that food sticks in a pan. In a good prepared Steel pan food sticks less than in a Teflon pan and is way more resistant to damages. The food sticks in the pan, if you don't wait to add the food until it's heated enough, not for other reasons, mistake often don by normal users. Professional cooks never use Teflon pans.

Preparing a Steel pan non-stick

  • Clean the pan after buy it
  • Heat the pan on the kitchen
  • Add some oil and heat somewhat more until it smoke
  • After this, wait until i's cold enough and distribute and eliminate the oil film over the whole surface with an kitchen paper.
  • Done

After this, to fry something, add a little oil and wait until the oil has enough heat (test with the handle of a wood spoon, if it forms little bubbles on it in the oil, the temperature is OK), to add the food. It will never stick this way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXEt-fhyCis

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago

Teflon itself is inert

About that

our findings suggest that PTFE-MPs-associated toxicity may be specifically linked to the activation of the ERK pathway, which ultimately induces oxidative stress and inflammation.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37419366/

Steel/iron > teflon for sure though.

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Teflon, on it's own is safe, the problem are the chemicals used to produce it.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Read the rest of my comments...

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In Denmark there was until very recently a factory doing something with teflon. That shit got launched out the chimney and just rained down everywhere.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] FlordaMan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, Dupont invoiced everyone.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 9 points 1 week ago

monsanto tactics

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, every factory that does "something" with Teflon probably wants to stick it to things, which are the problematic chemicals, not Teflon itself.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

In the same way Asbestos is a great material, just one small problem

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Asbestos makes for a great cigarette filter material, though.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

It is certainly... impactful for your lungs.

[–] Mambert@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

We are too weak for the miracle of asbestos.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Asbestos itself is toxic. Teflon is inert.