this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
1334 points (98.8% liked)

memes

14720 readers
3214 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

The really depressing thing about this, and many other "unexplained" aerial phenomena, is that it demonstrates how many people just never fucking look up at the sky.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Meanwhile, the government: “That’s fucking stupid. We don’t poison you with the air, that would be inefficient. We have to breathe that, too. We just poison the water and the soil, and if you’re a target we will just pick you up off of the street like a stray cat, we’ve always been very up front about that.”

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Conspiracy theories are an outlet. People need a reason for why society is not as good as they feel it could be.

Most people blame the other political party. But that doesn't work for everybody. The mind keeps looking until it finds a reason, and then it fades out all arguments that oppose it.

We laugh about conspiracy theorists, but most have the same mindset, just with socially acceptable topics.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah real chemical companies dump their chemicals straight into a river.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 3 days ago

Nice thinking, you're correct and after trying to avoid that pattern you become extremely aware of your own flawed opinions and how others don't care as long as it means they aren't pinned as the fault or reason

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 93 points 4 days ago (7 children)

"It's chemicals!"

"It's spider webs of chemicals!"

"It's microchips!"

"It's sun blocking special metallic smoke!"

"It's cancer seeds!"

  • My Mom, an expert on chemtrails
[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 65 points 4 days ago (3 children)

"It's chemicals!"

Technically correct, I guess.

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, and "it causes cancer" is as well. But not like... It's raining down cancer on you. More like jet fuel contains known carcinogens.

It's more the direct effects. According to my mom, the chemtrails should have...I don't know, but done whatever it was supposed to be doing by now. A 30+ year timeline for something causing cancer? So less bad than smoking? That's the metric?

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

At least some nutters have the decency to say that it's mind controlling chemicals, not the "you'll be dead soon" kind.

Kind of like the covid vaccine. I should have been dead in ~~3~~ ~~6~~ ~~8 months~~ ~~a year~~ ~~2 years~~ ~~3 years~~ ~~4 years~~ I'll be dead in 5 years!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

H~2~O

The most scary of chemicals

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What kind of cancer will those seeds grow into?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] blady_blah@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I had my conspiracy theory ex brother in law explain that chem trails were things Biden added to jets to fight global warming.... My response was "shit, I wish that was true!"

Somehow that wasn't the answer he was expecting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 64 points 4 days ago (13 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory

Patrick Minnis, an atmospheric scientist with NASA's Langley Research Center, has said that logic does not dissuade most chemtrail proponents: "If you try to pin these people down and refute things, it's, 'Well, you're just part of the conspiracy'".

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Dude on my Facebook posted a Pic of some repurposed 747 with a bunch of tubes in the cabin with a caption about the chemtrail stuff taking up space. Like, motherfucker, if it takes that much space, how is every passenger jet doing it??

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Those diagrams and pictures are a disinformation campaign. They show a system that obviously can't function, so you dismiss the theory out of hand.

But the reality is that they mix the mind control chemicals directly into regular jet fuel. The pilots don't even know they are involved.

/s

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

That or you're just "asleep" and need to "wake up".

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But these are the same people saying things are too "Woke"

So which is it?

🤣

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wake up, but don't be woke, obviously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

You can't ration people out of positions they did not rationalize themselves into.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Understanding is cemented in one's original source of information about the world. Shaping a pre-existing understand requires not just accuracy but volume, because you're not competing against faulty logic. You're competing against accumulated memories.

If someone is deep into the conspiracy theory rabbit hole, what is shaping their opinion is the consistent repetition of orthodoxy over time. Similarly, if someone is highly educated in a particular scientific field, their opinion is shaped by the persistent need to reaffirm fundamental truths in order to succeed and progress. We are not computers. We are not creatures of pure logic. We are the accumulation of our prior experiences and exposures.

You should not be surprised if an individual - when confronted with a narrow band of contrary information - does not immediately jettison all their prior information. Because ask yourself - would you? I mean, if a single guy showed up with a stack of papers insisting he's proved without a shadow of a doubt that chemtrails are real and the entire professional weather reporting community is lying to you, is there anything they could show you that you wouldn't greet with skepticism proportional to your exposure to professional weather science?

Because, if the answer is "No", then why would you expect someone immersed in hundreds of hours of conspiracy theory podcasts and think pieces and social media conversations to behave any differently?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Because even if chemtrails were a thing they’re logistically impractical. There are multiple unlikely leaps of logic

There are multiple steps of logic here

  • can aircraft spray chemicals? Sure, we have ag planes and fire fighting planes. In Vietnamese War we sprayed defoliant
  • is there a mind control chemical that can be sprayed?
  • if there was, could someone benefit from widespread dispersion?
  • can you spread it through jet engine exhaust within it destroying it?
  • is it possible to include with regularly scheduled air service without passengers or crew noticing?
  • how many people would have to be in on the conspiracy and what are the chances of keeping it secret so long?

So the current examples of spraying from plane do so all at once through special equipment. You’d notice plus can’t really be widespread. It’s extremely unlikely a chemical could be mixed into jet fuel, survive the combustion process, and be spread with enough concentration to be useful. There’s no way such a large program would go unnoticed, could possibly be kept secret. Most importantly, for what purpose? If someone were trying to mind control the whole country what does it benefit to dose a random person in a field with no special skill or access and where there’s no one around to control them?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This reminds me of the time when I was a kid and me and several of my family members went racing out into the front yard to watch the plane that was doing all kinds of aerial acrobatics over our neighbors's field dropping whatever chemical or fertilizer was in their tanks that day so we were all basically coated in it by the time they were done and we went back inside. Except I wasn't a kid when it happened, I was a fully informed adult who should have known better and then a few days later we found out it was some kind of potentially dangerous fungicide. But on the plus side I now have 3 penises.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This reminds me of my parents' stories of running out to play in the clouds of DDT when the spray trucks went through the neighborhood

Mmm, tastes spicy!

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

I got back in touch with a friend of mine who who graduated in the same class as me with a B.S. in Physics. When they learned that I'm an atmospheric scientist, their first question was "What's the deal with Chem trails?"

Point being, conspiracy theories also infect the educated sometimes.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

This thing is real, they're spreading dihydrogen monoxide vapours everywhere. Moreover every single dead person has the same thing in their body. Coincidence? I think /s

[–] HowAbt2morrow 32 points 4 days ago (3 children)

And in a country with dogshit standards for HS science. And math. And reading. And history.

[–] KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol 9 points 4 days ago

More like "High school science failed them" right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 28 points 4 days ago (9 children)

On the other hand, we have seen exhaust being very efficient in distributing chemicals with adverse health effects across the planet. Leaded gasoline was a huge oopsie that still has adverse health effects today.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

They think this is bad but think the lead in plane fuel is fine

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The only planes actually dropping chemicals are just doing farm work.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Uhhhhhmmmm akshually there are increased cancer rates near airports because, it turns out, setting jet fuel on fire and shoving it out of an engine to go fast leads to some of those chemicals settling into the land around concentrated flight paths.

This is the unfortunate kernel of truth that sets the dummies tilting at conspiracy theories instead advocating for environmental regulation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

When I read /r/teachers and all the trouble they're having teaching the next generation, this is the sort of thing I imagine is coming. A couple of years ago, GenZ was saying, in essence, "We just need to wait for all the 'boomers' to die off, then everything will be better." No. No, that will just make things worse. GenX leftists are the only ones holding the line, and Millennial teachers are about to give up and walk away, seriously. It's pretty fuckin' bad, and it's clear it's going to get worse, looking at how many kids are coming up through the school system who can barely read and write and have practically zero attention span or motivation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago

I literally put it together in highschool when someone mentioned it to me after learning about how clouds form from nuclei.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 days ago

More like elementary school. We learned about water vapor in 3rd grade.

load more comments
view more: next ›