Thorry84

joined 2 years ago
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So what was the point of the trade deal if the orange fucker still uses tariffs as a threat?

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 0 points 3 weeks ago

I feel it's a vaguely Australian term?

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 2 points 3 weeks ago

Interesting point. I don't really know what would be fair.

On the one hand you are right, if someone puts in a lot of time and effort to create a book. And it becomes a hit and gets a movie deal, I do believe they should be rewarded for that.

On the other hand, out of the tens of thousands of books written each year how many get turned into a movie? 1 or 2 maybe on average? And how much of the book is in the movie? I've both read Mickey7 and seen Mickey17. And while they both have some things in common, they are basically completely different stories. Should we really compromise the rules for everyone because of this very rare exception?

And I also feel like movies are caught in a slump the past years, with very few original stories being made. All remakes, reboots and super hero crap. If more stories were available for free use, how much would that influence new story creation? Very hard to say really.

As with all art, nothing is made in a vacuum. Everything builds on each other, everything is influenced by other things. I can't help but thing about what the community did with 3D printing once the patents expired. Having stuff available to use can only be a good thing right?

But I don't really know, you make a very good point. In a world where all kinds of art gets devalued all the time, I feel like we should celebrate artists and the art they make. I like to fuck around with creating my own art in my free time and have made stuff for friend and family. Even sold series of hundreds of units in the past. But it's not my day job and I consider myself an absolute amateur. Maybe if UBI was a thing, it would be the thing I put most of my time into.

I hate our world revolves around money and capitalism. It leads to difficult situations like this one, where copyright holds us back and mostly benefits large mega corps. But on the other hand, we must support artists for everything they do.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This joke is brought to you by the old people who's knees hurt

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 41 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Also this length should be at most 25 years and 10-15 years is better. These 75+ year copyrights are total BS.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's because GPT5 was such a disappointment.

Partly because they hyped it up beyond belief and partly because the results are actually bad. GPT3 to 4 was a big step up and with all the marketing people expected 4 to 5 to be just as big of a step. It turned out to be mostly a step sideways and in many aspects even a step back. Energy consumption is rumoured to be up, hallucinations are up and user experience is way down. At the same time all of the very public and high profile promises made are being broken and for a change people actually noticed.

The sentiment in the market was down for a while, but GPT5 release really kicked everything into high gear. Earlier people were disapointed "AI" didn't live up to the hype. Regular folks use it all the time as a replacement search engine, because Google had gotten so bad. But in businesses adoption was slow and where it was used the gains promised weren't seen. If the product was given away for free, people would use it, but even modestly paid subscriptions weren't taking off. But people thought: Hey, this is just the current level of tech, the next level is going to be so much better and improve a lot right? GPT5 proved that wasn't really true, so people lost faith fast.

LLM system are rapidly running into diminishing returns with larger models not yielding better results and sometimes even worse results. They also run into the issue they've poisoned the well. They used to train on data from the internet, but with the internet being flooded by output from older AI models, it's eating it's own shit. That's really bad for the performance of the newer models. Especially on things like coding and such, where it relies on code examples to produce new code. With Stackoverflow dying due to a lot of things, but AI being a big factor, there isn't as much of that as there used to be. Same for other stuff on the internet, once you kill the internet that great source of data is lost.

Now I don't think it's as worse (or good depending on your point of view) as some articles make it out to be. Many companies still see AI as the infinite money well the marketing claims it to be. A lot of people use it all the time, even though they've had negative experiences with it. But it's somewhat good to see some reality seeping in here and there.

I fully expect the shit to hit the fan and the bubble to burst in a catastrophic way. This will be bad, way worse than when the dotcom bubble burst. It's not going to be good for anyone. But better it burst soon than keep pumping it up further.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 8 points 3 weeks ago

Genuinely hate everything that’s going on right now

QFT

 

Hey @tedvdb, niet om te klagen maar volgens mij gaat er de laatste tijd iets niet helemaal goed. Response tijden zijn gigantisch hoog, regelmatig krijg ik timeouts en 503 fouten. De status pagina geeft aan dat de Photon interface up is, maar deze lijkt helemaal dood.

Mocht je op vakantie zijn, sorry voor het storen. Helemaal geen prio, gezien we niets betalen voor de dienst.

Heel erg bedankt voor alles wat je voor ons doet <3

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I hear this argument a lot and partly I agree, but partly I disagree.

It's still your asshole, it's never going to be clean. Sure it might be clean after using the bidet (if you use soap) or if you use the shower (you do clean your ass in the shower, right chat?). But it's not going to stay clean, your asshole isn't some hermetically sealed airlock. Bacteria are going to leak out. People also fart all the time, causing even more nasties to leak out.

So an asshole is never going to be a clean thing, that's why people don't mind cleaning it with just a bit of paper. Elsewhere on the body, people do try to keep clean (hopefully), so cleaning shit there with just some paper isn't good enough. Although there are so many people that don't wash their hands after using the bathroom and using a phone on the toilet is also pretty normal. And those disgusting people that keep their towels right above the toilet. So the standards might not be as high as I would hope.

Regardless, I still think bidets are a good thing. And people should use them. But the argument most used on the internet is a bit flawed.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you are trying to solve a legal issue using a technological solution. The issue isn't where his connections are coming from, the issue is where he's a resident. It's probably related to taxes or some other legal thing.

No matter what sort of technology you apply, you ain't solving the legal issue.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Is that why they drew up attack plans for Mexico? Probably some sort of bullshit like the gangs and caravans of immigrants keep coming over the border, so they have to go into Mexico to deal with them before the evil dangerous criminals get to the US border. Then occupy a part of Mexico and call off the elections due to the war. Trump is always talking about how he's like a "wartime" president.

 

She died about 10 years ago. I love and have loved all the pets I've ever had, but Pyxel was something special. She was very headstrong and did whatever she felt like, getting pissed off if you did something she didn't like. But when she was in the mood she would be the sweetest thing in the world.

She was saved from the dumpster, along with her mother and brother. The mother had to be put down and a lot of the brothers and sisters didn't make it from being dumped in a trash bag. But Pyxel and her brother made it and we adopted them from the rescue when they were very young still.

I remember Pyxel sleeping for hours in my lap, or in the cat bed on my desk. When I was working from home, she slept in the cat bed, till she got fed up, went for a drink and a snack only to get back and jump in my lap because it was her time and she would let me know it.

Still miss her every day.

 
85
Rescued old CRT (imgur.com)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Thorry84@feddit.nl to c/retrogaming@lemmy.world
 

Rescued old CRT I put a lot of work in. Was totally dead when I got it, rescued it to be almost perfect again.

It still has an intermittent horizontal size issue and the power button has some cosmetic wear. But at least the power button works, it used to only work when you would hold it down.

Be sure to enable the audio for some good retro tunes coming from the monitor.

 

Serious question. I know there are a lot of memes about microservices, both advocating and against it. And jokes from devs who go and turn monoliths into microservices and then back again. For my line of work it isn't all that relevant, but a discussion I heard today made me wonder.

There were two camps in this discussion. One side said microservices are the future, all big companies are moving towards it, the entire industry is moving towards it. In their view, if it wasn't Mach architecture, it wasn't valid software. In their world both software they made themselves and software bought or licensed (SaaS) externally should be all microservices, api first, cloud-native and headless. The other camp said it was foolish to think this is actually what's happening in the industry and depending on where you look microservices are actually abandoned instead of moving towards. By demanding all software to be like this you are limiting what there is on offer. Furthermore the total cost of operation would be higher and connecting everything together in a coherent way is a nightmare. Instead of gaining flexibility, one can actually lose flexibility because changing interfaces could be very hard or even impossible with software not fully under your own control. They argued a lot of the benefits are only slight or even nonexistent and not required in the current age of day.

They asked what I thought and I had to confess I didn't really have an answer for them. I don't know what the industry is doing and I think whether or not to use microservices is highly dependent on the situation. I don't know if there is a universal answer.

Do you guys have any good thoughts on this? Are microservices the future, or just a fad which needs to be forgotten ASAP.

 
view more: next ›