I mean, that was my kneejerk reaction too. There's more than just animal welfare at stake, though. Putting human organs in a critter has the potential to act like a bridge if we're not careful, and essentially spawn new covids.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m assuming there would be a lot of figuring out how to “wash” these organs before transfer. The growing being the first part of the problem, second part being sterilization and making sure no graft vs host. Can’t really wash these organs with tons of antibacterial or antivirals so it might be a really unique solution

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Antivirals only prevent replication, too. Virus capsids don't respire and have to be physically destroyed to neutralise them. Which is hard when you're trying to keep the delicate organ around them alive. Maybe you could use magical nanobots, but then why do you need an animal organ anyway?

The actual research is more centered around stopping it from happening in the first place, and then screening for any contamination. The critters might be raised in completely sterile conditions, and have already been genetically modified to remove any included ancient viral sequences in published work. Of course, all the producers have to actually follow the regimen everywhere in the world...

[–] Endward23 1 points 9 months ago

Putting human organs in a critter has the potential to act like a bridge if we’re not careful, and essentially spawn new covids.

Thats exact a problem. I personally think the solution could be a mixture of organoids and using this methode to create new organs. Since we are already able to cultived organoids. The problem is that his tissue doesn't grow in the form of "natural" organs and do not make connections with the blood and nerv systems.

[–] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

Would it be unethical to also eat the bacon and other meat from the organ pig? Cause if so, the McRib is back sooner than ever.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So it's a trolley problem between a small mammal or a human.

I'd wager that over 80% of people would choose the human life over the small mammal.

[–] ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Margaret Atwood continues to predict the near future with near perfect accuracy. I, for one, welcome our new pigoon overlords.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Did I just see a... No, it couldn't be... Snats are extinct...

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes. There's no ethical concerns since we already slaughter them for their organs.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

Not we, some assholes

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

No. We already treat animals horrifically so there's no need to make it worse.

[–] SchizoDenji@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Absolutely. We can breed animals specifically for this purpose. This can pose a solution to so many of life's illnesses.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

I didn't watch the video, but haven't there already been two pig transplant recipients that both died?