this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
268 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38299 readers
627 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please more!!!!!!

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Aand still +30% from year ago.

Is "Tesla is going bankrupt" then new "Putin has cancer"?

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 hours ago

If your erection lasts for more than 1h, see a medical professional or stop watching the Tesla stock prices

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The stocks are merely at pre-election levels and look like they have now stabilized unfortunately.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Down 5% today, not super stable. Could have been a dead cat bounce last week.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The instability is great for inside traders eg those who knew about the Whitehouse lawn stunt in advance. That was not a dead cat bounce, it was the stunt.

But the trend since the stunt has been stable enough.

I certainly will be looking at the graph each day rather than reading articles describing it.

Reminds me of how people laugh at the yo-yo tariffs, totally ignoring how insider trader buddies of Trump must love it. Is an overall economic decline going to bother them in comparison?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 10 hours ago

To the floor!

[–] pineapplepizza@lemm.ee 50 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Too big to fail. Prepare for gov bailouts.

[–] sanzky@beehaw.org 36 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

they have only survived so far because hype and government money. they have never been profitable. the stock could halve again and it would still be overvalued

[–] Reil@beehaw.org 6 points 12 hours ago

It's like 20x too high as it stands going by p/e ratios compared to the rest of the auto industry. Like 5-6x too big compared to tech companies. It's wild.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 40 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

That's illegal! TSLA is not allowed to drop. Prepare for your mandatory stock purchase, citizen.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

And then the citizens will own a chunk of Tesla? And we will see our investment pay off when it does well?

Pretend I made that into padme/anakin meme.

[–] makuus@pawb.social 9 points 14 hours ago

You jest, but I would seriously consider the possibility that he’ll sue anyone selling the stock, and sue the government for not investing in it expressly.

I mean, god, the tantrums he’s thrown at having advertisers take breaks—because I don’t think any of them truly left—from Twitter should be proof enough of the possibility.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.earth 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] IceAgeTower@feddit.it 1 points 1 hour ago

How considerate of you to write in a way fascists can read more easily

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

At the end of the day, there are actually better electric cars now for the price. Even starlink is starting to get major market competition for cheaper.

[–] remington@beehaw.org 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Even starlink is starting to get major market competition for cheaper.

Please elaborate.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Everyone and their dog wants to gunk up LEO with their soon-to-end-space-flight-forever space junk

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

Ok, so list the ones I can buy today

[–] Byter@lemmy.one 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Objects in LEO fall quickly (months to single-digit years) without station-keeping, mostly from atmospheric drag. Anything we put there wouldn't contribute to a long-term Kessler Syndrome situation. It's geosynchronous Earth orbit (GEO) we have to worry about, but once you're up that high there's a lot more room for everything.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

One study suggested all that burn up is bad for the ozone letter though

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Also introduces small amounts of bad metals in the air. It's one of the reasons wooden satellites are starting to be sent up.

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 2 points 3 hours ago

Doo you happen to have a good, informative link? Or perhaps a company name I could look up?

This sounds incredibly cool.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 25 points 18 hours ago

Let’s go for ten weeks! Then twenty!

[–] ivanovsky@lemm.ee 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Disclaimer: I'm stock illiterate. Are his other companies also trending down? Or are they not publicly traded or whatever? Is it known what % of his wealth comes from Tesla (vs Starlink or SpaceX)?

[–] jansk@beehaw.org 21 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Most of his other companies are not publicly traded, so there isn't much direct comparison. But Tesla has widely been known to be hugely over-inflated for years and years now, the bubble had to burst sooner or later. It is definitely being hit harder than the rest.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Tesla was overinflated because it was run as a software startup, where they had money pouring in from venture capital. They had money coming in, but it wasn't simply from sales. Let's see if that stalls too.

But wasn't his Tesla shares used as collateral for the Twitter financing? If Tesla tanks enough, won't his Saudi banking backers raise hell?

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if Elon is probably going to bail on Tesla after he gets all his SpaceX stock hooked into government contracts and stuff.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Some youtuber was saying as much. A lot of his wealth is tied up in Tesla and a lot of Tesla's valuation is tied up in Musk. But Starlink is making far more than Tesla, he owns a larger portion of it than Tesla, and he's selling Tesla shares. If he makes the right moves he can entirely walk away from Tesla and leave the shareholders holding the bag.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

holding the bag

And not doing shit that tanks the stock price and sales.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Couldn't he just, like, sell his shares like a normal person? Nobody's stopping him, right?

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 hours ago

Pretty sure he can't, since he isn't a normal person, just like he and the rest of the board have to announce any shares they buy or sell.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 17 points 17 hours ago

I’m waiting for Musk to have to sell his stock.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 11 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Can't wait for some "buy the dip" dickwads to catch this falling knife

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I did tonight, made 700 bucks. Not complaining.

But im not going to hold Tesla. Its going down on next revenue report when people see the sales.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that and the White House advert halted the dip the last few days.
Except fElon hasn't changed, so down it goes!

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 1 points 10 hours ago

It didn't halt, it was boosted. That is how insider trading works. Same with the yo-yo tariffs.

[–] unlogic@lemmy.zip 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Can it go negative so stock owners have to pay? /s

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 9 points 13 hours ago

You jest, but futures can actually go negative. At one point during covid a tanker shortage meant you could be paid a few $100 to accept delivery of a barrel of crude. Some people were joking about filling their swimming pools.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Good!

[I am now on a list.]

[–] azolus@slrpnk.net 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume you weren't before.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

We are all on the Verfassungsschutzliste/List of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution (lovingly nicknamed Faschistenschutz/Office for the Protection of Fascists)

[–] azolus@slrpnk.net 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Die sollen mal ihre Arbeit machen und die Verfassung schützen!

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Das kann der Antifa eV besser, die sollen uns eher mal nicht behindern.

[–] azolus@slrpnk.net 3 points 14 hours ago

eV (sponsored by Ampel)

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 14 hours ago

Aber ich habe "Arbeit macht Frei" gedacht.

[–] mat@linux.community 8 points 17 hours ago
[–] ZeroCool@lemmy.ca 8 points 17 hours ago