Ask Lemmy

religion was never the issue. the issue is people being stupid and lacking morals, which they will do and justify regardless of the situation.

I'd use Nietzsche's quote, "God is dead" to explain why we don't need religion and how Nietzsche used it to explain why we need to look for other sources of morality and ethics, but I'm too lazy to type rn.

Depends on the type of religion. One that preaches peace and tolerance and service and is against greed could be beneficial.

But the type of Christian fascists that elected Trump are not beneficial to society. They're the ones that either want you kiss dear leader's ass or die.

It should never be "Do we need religion?", it should be "Do I need religion?". Some people might need it, but it doesn't need to be pressed upon others.

You alraedy say it yourself in as many words, but we need more community. Where I am from, our country was 'columnized' up until the 1970s. You had a catholic 'column', a protestant 'column' and a socialist 'column', each with their own clubs. So you had a catholic football club, a protestant football club and a more public football club simultaneously. The same went for schools, pubs, etc.

For all the good and bad that gave us, people were shoehorned into their own communities (note my explicit use of 'shoehorned').

About 50 years ago, our society got 'decolumnized' and people got more individualistic. Add to it the rampant neoliberalism of the latest decades and well here we are: people do not know how to find each other anymore. I notice that many yourger people have similar questions like yours.

Do we need religion as in something to believe in or to have faith in? Possibly? However, I do not know what to believe in to be honest. Progress? Not going to live to see that anymore. It will get very ugly very soon. Maybe my kids will see things get better / more enligtened/ etc, but only after getting screwed over for a few decades I fear.

I do think that religion is not the answer. Men running around in dresses trying to force the ideas of mistranslated books written by goat herders several thousands of years ago are not to be taken seriously.

Did you notice all the harm Trump has caused in his first 24h because evangelical christo-fascists love and vote for him?

No. Religion is toxic.

I think we need community again; I don't think that means religion necessarily. Some of the most shameless, godless people in America are evangelical christians

No, fuck religion. Religion is the source of so many of our modern problems. People need more practice at rational thinking and religion often discourages that.

I'm fine with having better community but it's like... a really simple problem. Look at Spain, everyone spends their free time in common spaces where they develop relationships with their communities are stronger for it.

What we fucking need is less cars and more parks and plazas - we don't need a church meddling in our shit.

Not sure what country you're in, but have you seen the United States lately? The majority of the assholes here making life worse for all of us are doing so in the name of their god.

I'd say it's about time for the Age of Enlightenment to begin. For us to do liberty, progress, tolerance, use science and technology to our advantage. Invest in education. Maybe overturn the monarchs and billionaires.

Is faith your last resort?

Fuck No!

People. Family, friends, neighbors. Connect with real people. Not some con that's fooled countless people into giving away their $$ for fake promises and false "gods".

religion = smarmy cruel assholes

You're right that people are more selfish lately. That's deliberate - the elites are backing us all into a corner using stress and rage so that we'll fight each other instead of fighting them.

while community is desperately needed, religion is a con to control humans. the idea of the divine is utterly absurd and has no place in the modern world.

People didn't listen to their commandments when the majority of people believed in them, it just gave them a reason to hate those that were different from them.

Overall, I've found people who aren't religious to be more open minded, and far more accepting of people different to them.

The next step should be replacing fear of damnation with fear of the guillotine.

I'm a Preacher's kid, now an atheist. But I have been wondering the same thing. It's interesting I am not alone in that. In the last week I have seen the subject come up twice, once in this post and once at The Free Press.

Maybe a different form of religion. Not based on a guy with a long white beard but a force that created and keeps order in the universe.

Look man all I'm saying is I've met a lot of women that were sexually abused in their church and it was swept under the rug to not cause a scene. I don't know what the solution is, but more religion definitely ain't it

Religion doesn't make it different. People will still be trying to get their slice of the pie, but with religion it'll be dressed up as divine, and righteous, and you'll feel all warm and fuzzy about it. Ethics are what the priests in power say they are, and if your life is shit you can live happy knowing it's all just a grand trial with a warm and benevolent reward at the end. Sounds to me like the middle ages.

I'd rather not live with dilusions.

It's a good question. Obviously the answer is "no" in the narrow sense. Most genuine atheists are not going to spontaneously start believing supernatural dogma just because it's good for them.

the fear of damnation was check on their base impulses.

This is a double-edged sword. If some people are not doing bad things simply for fear of cosmic comeback, then they might also do bad things for other irrational reasons. Think suicide bombers. It's the Voltaire quote: "Those who can persuade us to believe absurdities can make us commit atrocities."

About damnation specifically, personally I'm with Dawkins on that one: this kind of belief can only ever begin in childhood, and to frighten children with threats of hellfire and damnation is a form of child abuse. I'm certainly pleased nobody ever did that to me.

Or it’s just the lack of community that religion once forced upon us, to see and be civil, if not caring for those in our immediate geographic community that hold differing opinions from us.

Yep I think it's this. Religion is above all a forum for community. What we're missing is community.

religion is a bandaid for vicious wounds

Religion is useful for one thing and one thing only - as a barrier to depression. Having a predefined higher purpose neutralizes the existential dread, it helps you function in the face of a meaningless life.

Unfortunately it's all false. Once you understand the the falsehood it doesn't help any more. Which is why so many religious people cling to their religion. Giving up on whatever belief kept them alive equals suicide, and they want to keep on living.

People need a purpose in life. The church gave people purpose. The bold, the brave, and the great thinkers outgrew the purpose imposed upon them by religion and forged their own path. The masses sought to follow them in the name of freedom and liberty of the mind.

Unfortunately the masses are dumb bumbling buffoons incapable of original though looking for a shepherd to guide them right into the wolf's moor.

We used to have a couple paths of religious doctrines (where each groups members share a collective ideal) all fighting eachother. We now have a million paths of "pseudo-religious" doctrines all fighting each other. For instance the american left and right resemble a religion more than they resemble a group of political ideals.

Just remember the average person is an idiot and half of all people are dumber than that.

Flaws in human nature will always be a problem and you will find them no matter what religion and/or political systems any society adopts. It's as simple as that.

Complicated to answer properly but I think that on the whole religion offers a good package. There's so much variety though and of course not everyone who identifies as religious is sincere; all institutions are attractive for those looking to exploit their influence, whether it's a religion, government, business etc. I'm interested in the social, moral, philosophical and spiritual aspects of religion but I'm also a bit allergic to institutions and am not humble enough to fit into the sorts of hierarchies that most religions seem to insist on.

People have always been out for themselves, it's not the fault of religion and religion is not the solution. Religion can give an outlet to those looking for structure and community in their lives, this can both be used for good and exploited in equal measure. The reason it feels more common that people are out for themselves is 3-fold: the internet has caused a weird bubble culture where you feel the need to make a name for yourself within the social media you are consuming especially with a growing population where it's harder than ever to feel like you even matter, a growing divide in economic class where the people at the bottom feel the need to pull themselves up any means necessary, and an increased amount of rich people being given a platform to preach their success/luck to anyone they want as an additional status symbol whether or not it's moral or even true

You will really enjoy reading Max Weber’s the Protestant ethic. I think that’s the title. It’s about how Protestant values on work worked really well with the new capitalism and how the values were maintained but god was removed. Highly recommend.

There are plenty of good reads on the sacred. I personally find it odd that you as an atheist have an idea of the sacred. Could you define it?

For community I definitely feel nothing beats religious communities. But it’s not a religion to religion basis but community.

It is a problem with scrolling (social) media. I've proved that one to myself, yet still struggle to disconnect more.