this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
-23 points (29.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27525 readers
1647 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not referring to the people who gamble once in a blue moon. I'm talking about those who gamble habitually.

How come they're all such garbage people, with legitimately no exceptions? Take a look at any high-stakes poker table and everyone except maybe the dealer is a de-facto scumbag.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 12 points 2 days ago

And his mother was a tailor.

[–] Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 day ago

I just find gamblers obnoxious, really. Like the ones who have to turn everything into a damn betting contest. I've been in YouTube chat rooms before when I used to have watched live stream dart events. And there was always at least 10 people there who just couldn't shut the fuck up about "OH THIS PLAYER LOST AND MADE ME LOSE MY MONEY!" or "ANY BETS?!?" or whatever else.

It just annoyed the fuck out of me because it takes you out of the game. And I hate how sports now have openly adopted gambling to where they cater to these people. Gotta hear about draft kings, gotta hear about odds, percentages and whatever else. I fucking hate the idea of gambling itself.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You take that back about Kenny Rodgers!!

I get what you're saying about gambling and pieces of shit, but you also say, "but not THIS kind of gambler." I used to play a ton of online poker, but there was no real money. I WAS gambling, and there were in-game prizes and prestige to win, but I think we'd both agree that probably doesn't make me a piece of shit.

So, let's put a finer point in it.

A would say that gambling is ESPECIALLY ATTRACTIVE to pieces of shit. The idea of getting rich by doing nothing, is going to sound REALLY good to the same people who would run a scam on your grandma. Throw in the fact that deception is a key element of poker, and you've created a game that gives an advantage to con men.

You're probably right that you'd find a higher percentage of pieces of shit in a group of gamblers when compared to non gamblers, but It's not the gambling that makes them shitty, they already were, and if gambling didn't exist, they'd probably just be finding other ways to scam their way to riches.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

I think it's probable that gambling, or any other habit that strongly activates certain reward pathways to the extent that it can form an addiction, would change your behaviour patterns in broader ways.

Almost all characteristics are both nature and nurture, and frequent gambling could change the balance of your personality.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“but not THIS kind of gambler.”

Pretty disingenuous when "this" is referring to someone who gambles once in a blue moon. i.e. someone who isn't really a gambler.

Otherwise, I mostly agree with you.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If we're talking about those who show up at high stakes poker tables, they are, at heart, businesspeople, those who you wouldn't expect to yield to anything/anyone. It's a demographic thing. They aren't all bad though.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Addictions are often a coping mechanism

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When I have a child, they can grow up to be whatever they want to be, as long as they aren’t “check 30 lottery tickets at the gas station while everyone is trying to go to work” guy.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It’s always so sad when I see people doing that. What a terrible existence.

[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Gambling is very addictive and free money is a powerful incentive for people with little hope.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Addicts? I think that's separate from gambling, but anyone who does it obsessively to the point it makes them a "piece of shit" is is an addict. And it's an expensive addiction.

I met a guy who had been a pro poker player for years and he was ok, just a person. He quit while he was ahead. I think you do have to be ok with lying to be good at poker, but other than that I don't think your universal rule holds.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

One of my colleagues is a former professional poker player and he seems well adjusted to me. He was between jobs and is good at maths/bluffing so spent around a year playing poker tournaments. I suppose the difference with poker is that you are playing against other people as opposed to the house so you have better odds if you are good (although the house has a rake which takes some of the money staked each round).

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And, as you said, your friend has the skills to shift his experience from games of chance towards games of skill.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Back when I was a student I also knew fellow students that would play online poker for beer money. Basically there is a dominant strategy for each hand you have, so if you've got 4 or 5 games being played concurrently then ultimately you'll end up coming out in profit.

These were just philosophy students too, not mathematicians. I wonder why more people don't do something similar. Maybe it requires more self control than you'd expect to stick to the "rules" of the strategy.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 2 points 1 day ago

It's still another skill to learn and master. Some folks work on winning hands at poker, others aim to win free beer at trivia. I, for one, can't bluff to save my life and have the memory of a goldfish so I'd be a horrible candidate for poker haha.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because they have the means (money) to squander it gambling, similarly squandering it on any other vice: self gratification.

It's incredibly selfish, it's probably money that could have made an employee's life better, or a charity more effective.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 days ago

This makes sense. I agree with you.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

One of my friends supported himself by playing poker while he was studying. He's a cool guy.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have you lost to one of them by any chance?

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago