this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
64 points (94.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35890 readers
1262 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Throughout my life, I've always heard people refer to the early 21st century years as "two thousand and X". For example, they pronounced 2001 as "two thousand and one". In my experience, during the mid-2010s there seemed to be a shift in the way people said it, and the first time I heard someone say it differently was in 2016, where they pronounced it as "twenty sixteen".

Most people I've heard pronounced the late-2010s years as "two thousand and X", although the pronunciation "twenty X" had started to catch on fast. By the year 2020, almost nobody used the "two thousand and X" pronunciation, except for very old people I knew. For example, most people would pronounce 2024 as "twenty twenty-four" and not "two thousand and twenty-four".

My question is: what year is the cutoff date for pronouncing the early 21st century years as "two thousand and X?" I've always heard people say it that way prior to 2016, I've never heard someone pronounce, say, 2007 as "twenty oh seven".

I hope I was able to properly articulate what I'm trying to say.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shartworx@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most people I know start at 2010.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My brain hurts. I've just spent like 3 minutes stating how the "and" isn't something I ever heard before. Then I said how it goes all the way to 2019. Then I remembered I don't remember anyone calling it Two Thousand Nineteen. It's Twenty Nineteen. But 2011 is Two Thousand Elevin, but I HAVE heard Twenty Elevin. And same with 2010.

So now it becomes a matter of geolocation region preferences. Different people switched over at different times. And I am NOT about to go spend my time researching thousands of different data points of who says what and when.

screams into a pillow

[–] Hope@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People may have also switched some years retroactively. I definitely said two thousand ten back then, but would say twenty ten now.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

.......no no no no.....you're making it even MORE complicated!!!!

screams wildly into pillows

[–] burkybang@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I say “twenty” for all of them now, like “twenty oh nine”. “twenty hundred” sounds weird now, but I guarantee eventually people will forget about ever calling them “two thousand and”.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you want to be a bit pedantic the and is incorrect for a year. When you say a number the and should be to denote a decimal portion of a number. It's generally not always used that way so context is often required to determine the intent.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

" Disney's 100.1 Dalmatians "

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

It's an unrated cut.

[–] eronth@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I know that's what they try to teach you in math in school, but absolutely nobody does it that way in practice, making it just wrong to teach it.

[–] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

You are allowed to write "eleven"

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

For me it was

2000: Two thousand

2001: Two thousand one (or less formally "oh one")

2009: Two thousand nine ("oh nine")

2010: Twenty ten

And from there on. I think this is because of the amount of syllables. That's why we switch to "twenty" instead of "two thousand".

[–] takeheart@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're on to something but I doubt it's the syllables. Rather it seems about phonetic ambiguity.

"twentynine" could mean both 29 and 2009, so it's better to use "twothousandandnine" for the latter. "twentyten" cannot be interpreted as 30, only as 2010.

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You can do "2009" as "twenty oh 9", but that feels kinda awkward. "Two thousand nine" has the same number of syllables (4). "Twenty ten" is 3. "Two thousand ten" is 4.

Even "1900" is "nineteen hundred" (4) vs "one thousand nine hundred" (6).

ETA: I'm the class of "Oh two" rather than "zero two" because the former is one less syllable.

[–] erev@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Twenty aught nine

[–] Soapbox1858@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I personally say "o one" "o two" etc. all the way up to "o nine" After that it just seems weird to say "ten" or "eleven" instead of "twenty ten"

Even referring to 1910 as "ten" seems weird and wrong, though. In my mind, it doesn't make sense to leave the nineteen off until the 40s. For example, saying: "Back in forty-five" sounds right, but "Back in thirty-five" sounds wrong to me for some reason.

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

2010, simply because of how english works.

If you say 2001 as twenty one, it's confusing. Same goes all the way up to "twenty nine".

And it's more garbled and slower to say "twenty oh one" vs "two thousand one", especially if you're speaking quickly.

"Twenty ten" and up, however, starts making sense as a different piece of information and can be used easily.

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I was gonna say most of this. I would just add that now, when referring to a year between 2001 and 2009, I just say "oh [number]". So I'd say "Did Batman Begins come out in '05 or '06?"

[–] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I say twenty oh one just because i dislike inconsistency and prefer twenty oh over two thousand

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] criitz@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I agree,

2009 and before have to be "two thousand and" style

2013 and after have to be "twenty-" style

The years between can be either, but I'd lean toward using "twenty-" style for those too.

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do you say 1901 then? One thousand nine hundred and one? Nineteen hundred and one? Or nineteen oh one? Have you ever heard of the Eighteen Hundred and Twelve Overture?

I'm in the "twenty oh one" etc camp, it's concise and consistent.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago

Nineteen oh one

But "two thousand and one" is different since it's a millienium. I would also say "one thousand and one", not "ten oh one"

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago
[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

*Two thousand and Twitter.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

*two thousand and (formerly twitter)

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Man......I'm just sooooo SO pissed off at language. In the 90s, I loved calling the current decade "the 90s". Then 2000 came, and people were like "It's the aughts!" to which I said "NO! FUCK YOU! I HATE IT, AND YOU SHOULD BURN IN A POOL OF NAPALM FOR EVEN SUGGESTING THAT!!!"

That being said 2000-2010 and 2010-2020 don't have a cool term for either of their respective decade names. So for 20 years I've been saying "OH MAN!!! I CAN'T WAIT UNTIL 2020 WHEN WE CAN END THIS MADNESS, AND CALL IT THE 20s AGAIN!!!"

Imagine my disappointment. Waiting 20 years for the year 2020 to arrive, excited to see what 2020 would bring. And then.....2020 happened. Now, if you forget what happened that year, that would be a result of the covid affecting your brain, and also your psyche trying to mentally block out images of horror. It's something that brains do when faced with intense psychological horror. Which is exactly how I would describe 2020. Imagine waiting 20 years, and THAT'S what you get.

Fuck

Earth.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The noughties, the teenies, and the twenties.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

burns that pile of tinder you call a home go the ground

[–] IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

2010 but skipping 2011 because twenty eleven sounds weird out loud imo

Seven Eleven has left the chat

[–] pagenotfound@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I also started using the new nomenclature after 2009. It also coincided to when I finished school so it kinda fit the change in lifestyle.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

I always say
"two thousand"
"Oh one, oh two, oh three..."
"Twenty ten, twenty eleven..."

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In twenty oh one.

So I skip twenty oh oh (twenty hundred?) in favor of the year two thousand

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was saying "twenty oh x" in 2001. Twenty oh one. Twenty oh two. And so on. I only ever said "two thousand" for 2000. Because "twenty oh oh" sounds dumb.

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

Where my twelvethousandtwentyfive people at?! We don't care about the Jesus, Neolithic Revolution all the way!

[–] edg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I remember discussing this in 1998ish and the concensus then was saying "twenty ___ " only.made sense statting in 2020. I actually started doing in the early 2010's.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago
[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Two thousand was obvious.
Two thousand and one as well, thanks to Stanley Kubrick.
I made a determined effort somewhere around 2004 to go back to the previous century's naming, and call the first decade "aught," as in "twenty aught six."

Nobody followed me in that.

Even so, I now refer to all years except 2000 and maybe 2001 as "twenty (aught/oh) ." Good riddance to "two thousand seven" as a year.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That happened back in Twenty Ten