this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
129 points (96.4% liked)

Futurology

3399 readers
211 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

awareness than LLM’s were or are, and anyone who looked seriously at what they were from the start and wasn’t invested (literally financially, if not emotionally) in hyping these things up, knew it was obvious that LLM’s were not and never would be the road to AGI.

It was a total blackbox that absorbed common sense knowledge which had been coveted in AI for a half-century, and that kept passing new tests as it scaled up. It was not obvious it would stop getting smarter. I have no financial interest in LLMs, I don't use them much and I fully expect they're as good as they'll get, now.

Comparing it to a videogame AI is nonsense. How much do you know about the inner workings involved?