this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

1804 readers
127 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Usually what's happened in the past is that new jobs become economical. If every possible job is replaced then that's the new territory.

I'm highly, highly skeptical this robot doesn't suck, though. They say it won't fully replace their workers, and I suspect that's because it's going to get stuck around a tricky corner or tangled in a loose pieces of packing tape constantly.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Then instead of a warehouse full of people, Amazon will end up with a warehouse full of robots, and a few robot babysitters.

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Best case, yes exactly. But again, that's happened before many times though (once upon a time, there was no conveyor belts or cranes in a warehouse either, there was guys doing that work) so I'm not too worried. Worst case it just fails.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The difference is that conveyor belts weren't poised to impact 80% of all jobs on the planet, AI is.

[–] CanadaPlus 2 points 11 months ago

Okay, modern agriculture then. Before industrialisation, 98% of people worked in agriculture as basically peasants. Now it's pretty much exactly the opposite, with 2% working in something related.

I agree AI could be a major problem if it gets even a little bit better. This specific story isn't an example though.