this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
-3 points (40.0% liked)

Futurology

2602 readers
42 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's all to grift investors and CEOs who surrounded themselves with yes men get the same news as investors.

We literally can't get it with silicon chips, because silicon is a solid.

I was literally just watching some videos with a panel of the world leading physicists in this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdzXbIW9kxY

None of these tech bros understand what consciousness is, they're operating on way out of date oversimplified explanations and assuming there's nothing deeper.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

The hope is that we don't actually need consciousness to produce something useful. And ultimately, that would be for the best. If we know definitively that silicon computing cannot result in consciousness, then many of the ethical concerns of using AIs disappear. You still have the ethical concerns of replacing human labor and using stolen work to train them, but at least you don't have to worry about creating a slave race in the process.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nobody understands what consciousness is - nor is that even relevant here. Artificial Super Intelligence that isn’t conscious is a perfectly coherent concept. While it’s valid to discuss whether a system like that could be conscious, there’s absolutely no reason to assume it needs to be.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Artificial Super Intelligence that isn’t conscious is a perfectly coherent concept.

Yes...

If you don't know what youre talking about. It's sounds plausible....

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

Well please educate me then. What am I wrong about?