this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
23 points (89.7% liked)

Futurology

1733 readers
144 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

There goes 90% of the jobs! I'm not feeling great about the future of a lot of careers, including mine.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Or there's going to be 10x more animation projects and more niche content as a movie or show concept now only needs 1/10th the previous audience size to justify greenlighting it.

[–] Lugh 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Perhaps. But there's only a finite amount of humans with waking hours to watch all this content.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's true, but the same could have been said for the move from broadcast TV to cable.

Or from cable to streaming services.

And yet what seems to be the case is that the more niche the content, the stickier the audience that gravitates to it.

For a business model that's increasingly built around increasing new subscriptions and decreasing churn, do you think 10 mainstream shows or 100 shows of similar quality with strong niche appeal is going to be more successful?

[–] christophski@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

Companies will find a way to exploit the available resources

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

That is an awesome potential outcome. I like you

[–] monk@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just because he says it, doesn't make it true. Right now we have ceos everywhere just saying "AI" in every statement to sound relevant.

And we already went through this moving from hand-drawn to computer animation.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

We already went through it when writing was invented and someone had an idea to start writing down the folk tales

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

AI as we currently know it is just a tool. If these morons with more money than brain cells, think that they're going to be able to drop all the liabilities, aka labor. And just have machines print them money they're sorely mistaken. It still takes people with creative talent and skill to write scripts. Frame shots. Direct action. Edit into coherent sequences. AI is good at putting things together. It's seen before. But creating new things still takes talent. The only question is do we allow these idiots to keep failing upwards. Or finally do something about them hurting everyone else to enrich themselves.