It makes some sense to me to use the currently more economically viable blue hydrogen in developing technology, but I do agree it is far from perfect.

Considering all this, I still think the negativity to hydrogen progress isn't proportional.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is why the negativity is not proportional enough… why are the oil companies pushing for this? It’s not so the wind and solar farms can split water in the future and cut them out of the equation, it’s to delay BEV adoption and try to create a future where they are needed to supplement the horrible efficiencies of hydrogen production, and the need to transport it all over the world.

None of these companies are trying to be altruistic, they are actively destroying the environment and buying influence, to continue making money by doing it.

Batteries are more efficient, more energy dense, cheaper, last for decades and can be 97+% recycled after those decades of service to produce batteries that are even more efficient.

Hydrogen has lost the battle for transport power.

I will cheer any Hydrogen progress that is not attempting to be applied to something that already has a greener alternative.