Luvs2Spuj

joined 2 years ago
[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Uphold right to peaceful protest

Sounds like something a terrorist organisation would say

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I walked the same way today, they grow fast.

 

I don't have an id, I just thought they were cool.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

When I saw the headline, my first thought was Mazepin. Perhaps his son's F1 career failure really got to him.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Looks good to me. Is there a plan to keep the puzzles updated? Not that 100k puzzles isn't enough for me, but if you get very specific with the puzzle type and rating that number soon dwindles. That would also answer my next question about increasing the opening repertoire options and endgame types.

Are you able to include a setting for movement speed? The pieces move slowly for someone used to playing online and/or premoving and I could see me getting frustrated with that.

One feature that nearly all puzzle apps lack, is 'no tactic' study. Knowing there is a move goes a long way to simplifying the thought process. If you can include a study type where you have to figure out if there is a tactic in the position or not, if there isn't you select a no tactic button instead of playing a move. I appreciate this is a lot more complex, but in terms of training it is the most valuable in my opinion.

The puzzles types look good, I might suggest one type that lichess has which is quiet move. It is similar to the no tactic I mentioned above. Something like that would be great

Lastly, I noticed you included a menu item for 'join r/offchess'. What would it take for you to switch that out to join c/offchess ;)

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Thanks for the explanation.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Does Matrix bridge somehow mean I can use something other than WhatsApp to send messages to people who refuse to use an alternative?

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Ben Shapiro - immediately backs off https://lemmy.world/post/35745709

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a real clear video of the shot. He dead.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

High quality shitposting? No thank you.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Shitposting doesn't have to be funny, but I got a chuckle from that title

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I get all my cat's dietary advice from this shitposting community, so if you wouldn't mind being less antagonistic towards the users posting valuable information that would be appreciated.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They even join her up on hunting stands

Are you talking about the human, or just failed to do any critical thinking here?

Taking a cat on a camping trip is hardly an ecological disaster. Permanent outside cats in the wrong places might be depending on where you live, but this post is just not comparable.

 

I was thinking today how cool it would be to live in a community that restricted technology to things no later than 2010.

I'm not sure exactly why but I can't think of anything after then that properly enriches my life.

If you could pick a date and create a real community around it, when would you choose?

 

I get why people don't like it, but when I scroll lemmy and see a post which looks like it has a decent level of engagements I'm finding an endless stream of replies that are always the same.

"Is this ai?" "Looks like it might be ai" "Ai slop" "This is ai, look at the [feature]"

Communities should set a rule to allow ai or not. Allowing ai but it must be declared could be a decent approach.

If there isn't a rule in the community that prohibits ai, I really wish people would cool it.

 

I have a load of filters set up on my feed, notably I don't want to see Trump or Elon.

Due to recent events, so much content is coming through that it is as if I don't have filters at all.

If the text or title doesn't include the key words, it can't be filtered. All the screenshots or posts with jokes or bad titles can't be filtered.

I think the only way proper filters could be achieved is with a separate 'tags' field that could be added to or voted on by community members.

This might all seem like a lot of effort, but feed filters are such a good feature that I think it would be worth it.

I don't want unreasonable perfection for the filters, but the system seems too flawed at the moment.

I have no idea where this kind of discussion or decision would be made so I'm just throwing it out as a question here.

 

There are lots of issues I have with them in terms of privacy, but I'm going to be very specific in asking about a certain situation and would prefer to stay on that topic if possible.

I have seen someone showing AI glasses which allow the wearer to cheat at chess. The glasses provide the wearer with computer engine moves, essentially making them unbeatable against even the strongest grand masters.

How can someone prevent this from happening, for example in a tournament match?

I don't consider this as being an issue at the highest level of professional play, but for club and casual players they might not have the resources to deal with this.

Currently the camera and/or screen information might be fairly obvious just by looking, but assuming technology improves this could become harder to detect.

Retrospectively, it would be easy to spot a cheater and correct results, however this still spoils things by having the cheating in the first place.

It isn't realistic to ask people to play without glasses, and I'm not aware of any way to stop cameras or ai from functioning.

So what can be done, if anything?

 

As a non USA resident, I didn't know who this was. Before I read the post that was the name I had in my head.

 

Sorry for the poor quality / lack of screenshot, this is from my work computer which I isolate from my personal devices, so I just took a picture.

view more: next ›