Luvs2Spuj

If you only want to talk about EVs, current technology and specific circumstances, sure.

I replied to the person above you who made essentially the same comment.

I understand that part and somewhat agree, but still think progress is cool. Especially in a futurology post.

I understand there is green hydrogen and blue hydrogen and considered adding a paragraph on that in my comment, but didn't.

I know most hydrogen isn't green, but there isn't a reason it couldn't be some day.

It makes some sense to me to use the currently more economically viable blue hydrogen in developing technology, but I do agree it is far from perfect.

Considering all this, I still think the negativity to hydrogen progress isn't proportional.

Every post about hydrogen gets a negative reaction, like someone has proposed using coal to power cars.

There are different suitable applications for different types of energy, it's not a situation where you have to pick one solution and that's it. I notice the same happens to some degree with posts about nuclear power.

Hydrogen has potential in things like shipping, aviation, trains and industry. Even if the exact concept in the article doesn't work, the lessons learned might advance technology in other projects.

I object more to the recirculation of other people's piss water over my hands.

I would also like to hear the statement from the Swedish government, on this news from Switzerland.

I think that's a massive over reaction to the general situation. There are noticeable changes taking place to undo the Tory damage to the country. He and Labor are far from perfect, but to question the point of why you would vote Labour over Tory is just insanity.

I thought shared parental leave was a legal minimum? For the uninitiated, that's where some or all the maternity leave can be given to the paternal parent, meaning there isn't an inequality.

If they are campaigning for more for both parents, I'm not sure I am on the same page. I can see how this would make me unpopular though.

Energy needs can be met and shouldn't be an argument for using plastic.

The pollution could be more dependending on how you look at that statement, but making something without plastic results in less plastic pollution and you can't claim that to be an overall loss for the earth.

This guys name is colon? That's going to take a pounding in boot camp.

When the benefits listed are the legally required minimum holiday and pension, plus on site parking. Usually these are also paired with a competitive salary.

Edit: it's late, I can't read and wrote about things in a job advert rather than an interview. I'm going to bed, maybe I'll try do some Internet tomorrow.