this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
106 points (92.1% liked)

Futurology

3003 readers
250 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It uses soil, without firing it sounds like they're just expensive mud huts?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Better than nothing!

This is the UN, remember. They aren't worried about people with options. The question is if this thing is actually easier and cheaper than local labour.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Another good point- lets fix poverty by replacing local labor with a 3d printing machine!

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

I'm no luddite, if it makes sense to automate some menial task we should. Let's do the napkin math.

It says it costs 180,000USD. A labourer in rural Columbia might cost 1USD per man-hour. If we assume it replaces two workers, and produces a house generously 3 times as good, that's your investment back in 30,000 hours, or ~3.5 years.

Actually, that's decent. I guess I was expecting it to cost millions. If you make less generous assumptions, you get a less generous result, but they have a shot.