Futurology

1855 readers

94 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

324

New German research shows EVs break down at less than half the rate of combustion engine cars. (www.adac.de)

submitted 7 months ago by Lugh to c/futurology

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It would be weird if my reasons contradicted my conclusion

You're missing the point. You just came up with a reason to support your conclusion. This isn't data. It isn't even really a theory, it's just an untested hypothesis. Most anyone can do this with any claim, which I demonstrated by doing it for mine as well. Which of ours is more valid? Both sound like reasonable hypotheses, at least IMO.

but there’s also folks like me who wouldn’t buy a Tesla out of quality and price concerns

Sure, but my point is that those "quality concerns" may not be the result of actual quality issues (at least relatively to any other car brand), but because some people don't like Musk, and thus will continually point to anything that makes him look like a failure. This leads to a cognitive bias of people who think that because they are hearing about it a lot, it must be happening a lot (availability heuristics). Or simply, some people don't like Musk and are looking for a reason not to buy a Tesla, so they latch onto "quality" issues they've heard of to justify not liking Teslas, when in reality they don't like Musk.

Don't get me wrong, I was seriously considering buying a Tesla, now it's way down on the list of potential cars I may buy when the time comes. So it's not like I'm trying to get you to buy a Tesla. What I'm trying to ask yourself if it's your bias or reality that is driving your disqualification of Teslas. Certainly, which is a big driver for me, price is a concern.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You’re missing the point. You just came up with a reason to support your conclusion. This isn’t data. It isn’t even really a theory, it’s just an untested hypothesis. Most anyone can do this with any claim, which I demonstrated by doing it for mine as well. Which of ours is more valid? Both sound like reasonable hypotheses, at least IMO.

I don't disagree with calling it a hypothesis. I said theory, which is synonymous in normal language. It's what I had.

It's also true that people hate Musk, and so I need to take what they say about Tesla with a grain of salt. I'm pretty sure I had heard this back when people still thought he was a savior of some sort, but as others have pointed out the cars themselves have changed.

Price is a concern, and for myself open-sourceness and repairability are a concern. Unless it's also anti-Musk hype and I'm misinformed, the Tesla ecosystem is a hell of a walled garden.