this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
124 points (94.3% liked)

Futurology

1798 readers
65 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 31 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Probably. But if it means that you can have a lifetime heart pacemaker without ever changing batteries or external charging ports, that may be convenient. I mean, the tradeoff here is probably for people that are worried about more severe things than being a bit slower when jogging.

[–] drislands@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's a fair point. I suppose it depends on how much oxygen it takes, exactly.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Exactly. It depends on the option.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago

And how well oxygenated the person is. If they're chronically really anemic it might be a problem where it wouldn't for a healthy person.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't a pacemaker last like 10 years now? It would still need battery I guess even though it charges by blood oxygen. Imagine having carbon monoxide poisoning but what killed the patient was the pacemaker that died.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 months ago

Doesn't a pacemaker last like 10 years now?

Yes, but a nuclear pacemaker can last a lifetime.
A bio-battery has that same advantage without containing a radioactive sample that needs to be removed when you die.