this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
738 points (98.4% liked)

Futurology

1854 readers
4 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 93 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

Technically kosher because there's no cloven hooves?

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As a technical Jew I can say that yes, this is technically kosher ^disclaimer: I have no knowledge at all of Jewish custom or scripture^

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 40 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Their mother was Jewish but they haven't been taught the religion, making them technically Jewish but without any knowledge of Judaism.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

He’s a Jew but not Jewish.

Like me.

One is an ethnicity. The other is a religion. It’s easy to get them confused.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 32 points 9 months ago

He’s Jew-ish

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So is everybody here a technical Jew? Like, that's three of us, and this isn't a huge community.

[–] flathead@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm Brian, and so is my wife.

[–] Duranie@literature.cafe 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Brian is an interesting name for a woman. Then again, my brother Steven married a man named Stephen.

[–] flathead@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's from "Life of Brian", and somewhat related to Jewish identity. Here's the referenced scene - recommend the whole movie if you've never seen it.

https://yewtu.be/watch?v=4SYc_flMnMQ

Good for Steven and Stephen, and wish them every happiness.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I'm reasonably certain I wouldn't count. As far as I know there were no Jews (by ethnicity) in my family for the last couple hundred years.

I do, however, count as a Native American, specifically I'm ¹/16th Lakota.

[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 5 points 9 months ago

Ahhhhh this makes more sense, thanks for clarifying!

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Bingo 👍👌

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They're a theoretical Jew like Einstein was a theoretical physicist.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

But is it considered cannon?

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

They’re not technically kosher. Nor halal.

NOT YET

It hasn’t officially been ruled upon by either kosher or halal certification boards yet (although many Jewish and Islamic leaders have expressed differing opinions on the matter), but most lab meat growers very much hope it will be ruled as what is known as “parvere” — or not meat. That is to say, since it didn’t actually come from an animal, it’s not technically meat, it has no blood, wasn’t slaughtered, etc., and, as such is considered more in line with a vegetable or other foodstuff that isn’t milk or meat.

If lab meat is considered in this way, it could clear the way for Kosher and Halal certification as well as for Hindus who do not eat beef, and many others with objections to eating meat for various reasons.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

kosher or halal certification boards

That's fucking wild.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

We live in a brave New World, adjudicated by a very old and blind one

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Imagine if the next big Abrahamic schism comes over wether or not lab grown meat is halal/kosher or not.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

While the Christians cry over whether it’s “woke”.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The mere mention of stem cells will rustle all the Christian Jimmies.

[–] DucktorZee@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I culture cells for a living. Not that these are the only ways, but the most common and effective ways to grow cells in the lab is to add either FBS (fetal bovine serum) or BSA (bovine serum albumin) to the culture media. Currently we don't mass produce BSA in an animal free manner and FBS is by nature an animal product. Granted, that the products of one animal may in fact allow manufacturers produce more than enough 'animal-free meat' to overcome this but I haven't seen any numbers. I'm interested in hearing more about these techniques going forward and in determining if animal-free products can really be produced animal free.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Do you use Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) to make your meat?

No, for a simple reason: we’re committed to making meat without causing any harm at all to animals. So we’ve developed a production process that doesn’t require FBS.

That's what they say.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Where did you read this? Could you link a source please?

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

A man of culture I see

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I culture cells for a living.

Relatable.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What if it requires 1/1000th the number of animals … but each one suffers a hundred times more?

Would it be worth it?

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How do you quantify suffering?

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you don’t have a way of quantifying suffering, perhaps all utilitarian calculus is bunk?

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 1 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately, I don't really understand your response.

You talked about one hundred times the suffering. What does that mean? To me, the way animals are held in mass production is completely unethical and there is no way to make it worse... So how do you make the animals suffer even more?

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From a utilitarian perspective, you're still reducing overall suffering by an order of magnitude, so your scenario is still a greater good.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

This assumes a linear value function of course

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

stem cells can suffer? this isn't cloning an animal, it's cloning certain tissues.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

Hence the word “if” here. A hypothetical scenario.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

I culture cells for a living.

Sorry, this is all my addled GenX brain could think of when I read that.

https://youtu.be/GIuZSaqse-A

😁

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago

Asking the real questions!

Yes, very Kosher.

source: porky the pig