this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
166 points (95.1% liked)

Futurology

1809 readers
174 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LostXOR@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I got an acceleration of 1.5G for the test, did you forget a factor of 2 or something? Still certainly not an enjoyable experience for passengers, but I assume it would accelerate over a much longer distance if a full track was built.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think I'd probably be fine with 1.5Gs as long as the jerk and snap were low.

[–] LostXOR@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Adding in Earth's gravity it's about 1.8G total, applied at a weird angle, which might be too much for some people.

[–] GbyBE@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did you also factor in that the train needs to come to a full stop in that 2km as well?

[–] LostXOR@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes, I calculated the acceleration required to accelerate to 387MPH (173m/s) in 1km.
v^2 = 2ax
(173m/s)^2 = 2a(1000m)
a = 14.96m/s^2 = 1.53g