that's what i'm saying dawg no human ever alive could achieve that typa skull, transvestigators want every man to secretly have a pussy there's no other explanation

"i don' want my damn tax dollas to go towards no damn kitt'ns!!! send 'em to the army or cops like god intended!!! "

bro i swear china could implement a "free kittens and cupcakes and rainbows for anyone" policy tomorrow and somehow the NYT gonna find a way to have a problem with that

the death of charlie KKKirk

< "pshh, women are so dumb. all these damn "sOcIoLoGy" grads walking around not pregnant or engaged. what a waste of wombs--"

pew pew pewwww......

AAAAAAAACKKK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

< "oh, charlie!!!~ guess which minority we're gonna terrorize toda--

< "GASP! TED KAZINSKY, WHAT HAVE YOU DONE????????

< "shit shit shit fuck god fucking damn it i planned this shit for weeks why the FUCK is this dumb removed here NOW??? fffuuukckckk what do i say what do i do??--"

"hey guys how's it going"

"IT WAS HIM!!! IT WAS HIM HE GAVE ME THE GUN HE MADE ME SHOOT THE GUN PLEASE TRUMPY BEAR BELIEVE ME!!!" >

# "COPS, ARREST THAT MAN IMMEDIATELY!!!" ________ "sir yes sir snort"

clink clink "sir you have a right to defend yourse-- i mean be silent"

"cowabummer"

< "are you okay trumpy wumpy?"_______"yeah i guess but i'm just... i'm so heartbroken... my bestie kirk got his shit rocked by a white mormon kid from utah... man... " >

"another day another banger"

THE END

edit: posted this in the wrong thread but yk what i'll leave it here, still applies

absolute cinema

the lore you're gonna get is gonna be nuts

as usual, the bill is using intentionally vague wording by not defining what counts as "supporting terrorism" and expands (not redefines) terrorism charges to simply saying things that the regime doesn't like. from what i'm reading, if a person gives "material support [what does that even mean???] to terrorists", their visas or passports could be revoked on sight.

The other section sidesteps the legal process entirely. Rather, the secretary of state would be able to deny passports to people whom they determine “has knowingly aided, assisted, abetted, or otherwise provided material support to an organization the Secretary has designated as a foreign terrorist organization.”

The Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that even offering advice about international law to designated terror groups could be classified as material support. The government even deemed a woman who was kidnapped and forced to cook and clean for Salvadoran guerrillas a material supporter of terrorism, in order to justify her deportation.

as the article brings up, the bill is almost identical to the past "nonprofit killer" bill that failed to pass. so as most people predicted, if this new bill is able to pass, the regime will have the ability to squash and shut down anyone and anything who supports an organization that the regime does not approve.

so is there a way to appeal this annulment if you happen to be the unfortunate bloke that said the wrong thing? well...

*Citizens would be granted the right to appeal to Rubio within 60 days of their passports being denied or revoked. “Basically, you can go back to the secretary, who has already made this determination, and try to appeal. There’s no standard set. There’s nothing,” [Hamadanchy] said.

and what will happen to the people whose legal documents are revoked? i'm sure we all know already. yet again, america proves to us that the cruelty is always the point. bill's first hearing is on wednesday this week.

you just know all the dems are going to do is pull a "guys pwease don't do this that's mean!!! 🥺🥺🥺" and the bill will pass 51/49.. america is a fucking dumpsterfire

it takes imperialism and puts it on turbo. one common characteristic among past fascist states is their ultra-nationalism and the formation of unquestionable national identity. which makes sense, come to think of it; when the world falls apart, people tend to cling to the old and trustworthy rather than the new and untested. fascism just corrupts that old way of life into a system that defines itself by strict classes and the thirst for blood.

trying to define fascism is like trying to pin jelly to a wall, so your definition is as good as mine. the whole point of the ideology is that it adapts to the environment it's in. but at least usually fascism has some charismatic leaders and cool visuals. i'm not sure if america could've picked a more embarrassing and corny administration to run their country to the ground.

but the world of the fasc is static and unchanging

that applies more to classical conservatism, i think. fascism as an ideology often strives to get rid of the present social hierarchy and instate a revised version of said hierarchy, to better accommodate the needs of the elite. but i get what you're trying to say. religion is a mess i don't want to be part of.

charlie and erika t4t couple confirmed?!??!?!?!??

what kind of mindfuckery does a person need to be on to do shit like this?? brother kirk has kids his wife was walking around very pregnant and posted pics of it online, be real