jjjalljs

joined 2 years ago
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 22 points 8 hours ago

Someone should stop Musk. With like a piece of metal if needed.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 8 hours ago

Good. More.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 9 points 22 hours ago

Conservatives are bad people. This is well known. Outgroups to bind, in groups to protect.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe we should, like, storm one of these ice facilities, have our own bastille day.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There is truth here.

I think rich people will have assets, like stock, and they'll get a loan out with the stock as collateral. They pay like 2% on the loan, but they get like a million dollars cash. If that was treated like income, they'd pay a lot more taxes.

Not sure the best way to address this, but it should be addressed.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like if we had spent the money lost to tax cuts on enforcing existing laws, like really throw the book at tax cheats, like put them in orange jumpsuits and make them rot in a cell, we'd have had better outcomes.

The ultra rich should be afraid.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Meanwhile, the US is trying to go to 60 hour workweeks and 6-day workweeks.

Labor needs to organize, and the rich need to be broken.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some people love their country like a child loves their parent. Perfect, the strongest smartest ever, can do no wrong. Any criticism is an attack and unacceptable.

Some people love their country like a peer. They see their strengths and their flaws, and they want them to grow and improve. Sometimes that means hard conversations and difficult changes. But they do want what's best for them.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 day ago

I don't know PBTA well but I believe so.

Basically, every scene and character can have 'aspects', which are things that are true about them. They're free form. Sometimes they're just there, like if you're in a bar it might have "Bubbling with drunk banter" or "Loud Pop Punk Soundtrack". Aspects can then affect what makes sense in the scene. "Loud Pop Punk" can make it easier to move without being heard, but harder to make a speech because no one can hear you, for example.

You can also explicitly create aspects. Turn off the jukebox and the aspect might change to "Weirdly Quiet Bar" or whatever. In a fight, you can use the "create an advantage" move. That's for stuff that isn't about taking them out of the conflict right now, but setting things up. Like pushing them off balance, disarming them, screaming "LOOK! A DISTRACTION!" whatever. If the roll comes out if your favor, you can create an aspect that's true and can also be invoked for a numeric bonus on a dice roll. So if you pants the guy you're fighting, he can't run full speed to chase you because his pants are down. You can also invoke that if you want to kick his ass, for a bonus on the dice roll.

These are all free form and it's up to the group to decide what it actually means. Most groups probably wouldn't let you invoke "I'm literally on fire!!" as a bonus if you're trying to sneak through a crowd.

Typically, as I understand it, you're either trying to take them out of the fight or trying to create advantages for side of the conflict. On a dramatic success on trying to take someone out, you can also create a small advantage.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago

Maybe something that reflects on all the loss. Dead from COVID, chaos from government programs shutting down, allies betrayed, and a mirror in the center that says something like "you did this".

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I enjoyed the simplicity of old video game RPGs where the price of the item directly scaled with the value of the item. Armor for 1000gp was just straight out better than the one for 300gp.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 26 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Many people don't really think about their language. They kind of snap their phrases together like a child with those big duplo blocks.

Most of the time that's fine, if a bit limiting. But occasionally you get glimpses into how communication could be clearer, or more accurate, if they thought about their words more.

I partly blame our public education system. Not enough funding, some funding misused, other problems I don't even know about. But it feels like a lot of people are barely educated, and don't have any intellectual curiosity.

 

Like I saw one that was titled "I wonder why rule" and had a picture about overpaid CEOs or something.

Why "rule"? What's the origin of this format?

view more: next ›