Unfortunately no, which is probably its only shortcoming. I think they're a fairly small team, it was android only until recently.
blackbirdbiryani
After years of trying every budgeting app possible (including YNAB) the only app I've found that does everything well is Bluecoins. Split transactions, multiple accounts, handling of credit/debit, recurring transactions, bill reminders, automated reading of bank app notification (to parse transactions), easy reconciliation of accounts, cloud syncing, etc. Definitely well worth the single purchase price (fuck subscription pricing models).
In reality they'd just price it so only the rich can afford it. It's not that complicated.
I have a lot of doubt over the graph just based on how they average the results. You're bound to get people guessing super high or super low, which would skew if they were just getting the mean.
Yea nah, you can definitely work perfectly fine without using any AI at all. Saying otherwise is ridiculous, I mean I use IDEs but I don't dream of pretending that I'm more productive that grey beards who still use vim/Emacs.
The truth is outsourcing cognition to AI will atrophy your own decision making skills. Use it or lose it.
I use Dropbox too. Though I have to admit, when running code you sometimes have to pause sync otherwise it interferes with code execution. But definitely worth the peace of mind. Sometimes you don't want to commit stuff until you're sure that it works.
Except y'all have nuclear weapons and the rest of us mostly don't. When you're done with your local genocides the US will inevitably turn outwards for a scapegoat.
Maybe a lukewarm take now, but you can no longer expect to succeed well in biology if you don't have at least an intermediate understanding of programming and statistics.
Without the former, you are going to be wasting a lot of time doing manual work (I kid you not but I see my co-workers waste literal hours gazing at matrices in Excel like they're gonna land on a significant gene by accident).
Without the latter, you are going to be wasting thousands of dollars in reagents and working time running experiments that never had the hope of succeeding (what do you mean I need more than one replicate?).
Yes you can stick to lab work but don't expect to get paid more than the average janitor, because you're competing against literal thousands of graduates who can use a pipette but not R. Maybe if you were a specialist in an expensive niche equipment like flow cytometry or mass spectrometry, but surprise surprise, these kind of equipment require an even more advance understanding of statistics to understand/process the results.
If you're a biologist who thinks you hate math, I promise you programming is more approachable than high school math, there's so many tutorials available these days for free that are leagues better than any material from your professor.
Try to get as many opportunities that involve command line work on clusters, analyses with R, and maybe python as well, and you'd be a candidate that would stick above the rest. Programming and statistics is rapidly becoming a common competency, and if you don't have those skills you won't be able to compete with people who do.
It's significantly more accessible than trying to sync bookmarks with an Ereader's shitty browser
Agree, I've used both top/side loaders and side loaders are perfectly fine despite their lower water usage.
More a reflection of people's attention spans these days compared to when the movie is released. Read any online discussion about media and it seems like people are on their phones for 40% of the show at minimum.
Hell the original film would probably not do well if released today because it doesn't have the obvious shoehorned plot points that the new movies have to cut through the morons.