Philosofuel

joined 1 year ago
[–] Philosofuel 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is there even any government left after this?

[–] Philosofuel 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I've noticed that a lot of people are just really bad in using the right searching terms, and then quickly shifting through all the info to find the right information. Googling well truly is a skill. Though be it a strange one.

[–] Philosofuel 1 points 2 weeks ago

Just putting it out there, you are not. Your deeds and intentions are what define you. And there is no race or nationality that makes you inherently bad or good.

[–] Philosofuel 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I always imagine future historians having so much fun learning about this period.

[–] Philosofuel 9 points 3 weeks ago

I guess they don't want allies.

[–] Philosofuel 21 points 3 weeks ago

I would say, a good conversation. Listen to him, ask question, don't be too judgemental (and that can be hard). But also accept, that for a big part, you can't form/force his way of thinking. In the end he has to find his own way in life.

[–] Philosofuel 6 points 4 weeks ago

You know this happened with cars also, until there is a new disruption by a new player or technology - companies are just coasting on their cash cows. Part of the market cycle I guess.

[–] Philosofuel 4 points 4 weeks ago

It really does feel like a trillion dollar investor game of chicken, where some investors or company has to admit defeat at some point.

[–] Philosofuel 2 points 4 weeks ago

Thanks for further elaborating. I think I get your point a bit better now.

[–] Philosofuel 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So do you think a centralisation of AI "power" will lie in who has the most/best data? Was just reading Nexus, and Yuval Harari suggests that a centralisation of power is due to the most resources (data centers) and the data itself. Wondering what your take is, or if I'm not getting it.

[–] Philosofuel 4 points 1 month ago

For sure, especially these decentrale solutions work for places with limited to no access to a lot of resources now. Very interested where a lot technological leapfrogging will take place

[–] Philosofuel 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, I agree we have to accept change. In the long run sure, life will be okay, and a new totally unique array of different species will exist. I think next to a healthy stable biosphere, which biodiversity is a fundament of, a lot of people feel the grief/sadness because of the loss of all this natural beauty. Be it ecosystems or species. And I think a problem is, that sure nature adapted and shifted due to natural cycles. Deserts and jungles moved north/south/east/west depending on changing circumstances. But next to geographical limits, there is also the limit that a lot of ground is claimed and protected by culture. Be it agricultural or cities.

I don't totally agree to the COP progress, yes it is a slow process. And totally not moving at a speed we need or like. But at the moment it is the best we have. And as far as climate goes, a lot more has been done because of COPs then without them. Though I certainly hope we can develop better processes and cooperation between countries on these issues.

 

In a first, an American woman used a suicide pod to take her own life. The process took place in Switzerland. It's done by pumping in only nitrogen gas, so the person will lose goes dizzy, loses consciousness and eventually dies. Enter futurama memes.

33
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Philosofuel to c/futurology
 

Analysis of why and how humanoid robots will displace human physical labour.

view more: next ›