As much as I'd love that idea, I would guess there are financial reasons to not allow things like that, as both advertisers and credit card companies seem to really hate erotic and erotic adjacent media.
Armok_the_bunny
I assume the rich neighborhoods will have already have had their pipes replaced, in which case it would only be those people who are affected. Not that I have anything to back that suspicion up.
Technically that's still on appeal, and tbh I do expect it to get overturned somewhere.
The game looks good, and I first heard about it because they are hiring a dedicated narrative designer.
IIRC homes are protected in bankruptcy, because someone decided it would be unfair to inflict homelessness on someone for committing the crime of being broke (irony very intended).
Didn't even offer a refund it sounds like.
"Hey, I know we just fucked up and let a ton of personal information out into the wild. As compensation how would you like to keep using us?"
I will point out there are actually pretty good driverless cars, they just aren't made by Tesla. Look up Waymo if you want to look into them.
I'm going to second this, the linked video explains a lot of the controversy really well.
I agree it would be best for Wikipedia to address this on their end, but I have actually no idea where to begin with asking them to make a change like this.
It actually does switch automatically on mobile, just not desktop, which is why I get annoyed enough when it happens to mention it.
Please, anyone who reads this, stop posting links to the mobile version of Wikipedia. It doesn’t switch automatically on PC, and I see it happen all the time. Just take the half a second to remove the “.m” from the beginning of the link, save everyone else from the pain of having to be surprised by it and taking the time to do it themselves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8H1u-zh9dmU