this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
6 points (87.5% liked)

Futurology

1812 readers
156 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's also hobbled itself with a terrible acronym.

  1. Where's the "O" in "Lunar Guidlines for Infrastructure Consortium"?
  2. Don't include the word consortium, because even the people that thought they were cleaver with this name will end up calling it the "LOGIC Consortium"
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Lugh 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Although it doesn't get much attention in western media, China shows every sign of having the first lunar base in the 2030's. NASA's plans are hobbled by the politics of the SLS, and hopes SpaceX or Blue Origin will come up with an alternative. In particular many hopes are pinned on SpaceX's StarShip, but the challenges it needs to overcome to get people & materials to the moon are formidable. China's plans are detailed, organized and tied to concrete goals.