this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
588 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

76670 readers
3415 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Handing online servers over to consumers could carry commercial or legal risks, she said, in addition to safety concerns due to the removal of official company moderation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 5 days ago (8 children)

If digital ownership isn't acknowledged, digital piracy doesn't exist. It's just copying something no one owns.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 days ago

Commercial risks are something businesses have to consider themselves, it's not government's job.

Legal risks are exactly their problem to solve.

Company is a body of people, and its moderation can't be more or less safe, in principle, than moderation by some other body of people with responsibility for that.

Excuses.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

"Digital ownership must be respected."
Yeah, that's what this entire thing is about.

[–] tyranical_typhon@lemmings.world 69 points 6 days ago (2 children)

in addition to safety concerns due to the removal of official company moderation.

Piss off. This just means they won't be able to rely on companies to control what people get to say.

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

They mentioned the early days when it comes to licensing games to us.

But dont mention that in the early days of multiplayer games it was us moderating our own online communities, not the company selling the game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 43 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The same govt that saw the overwhelming support for petition against the Online ID verification Act & went nahhhhhhh we don't listen to our citizens.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 7 points 6 days ago

Unless it's a referendum, apparently.

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago (2 children)

They don’t need to “hand online servers” just publish the API and do one last update to accept self hosting.

And new releases should always support self host.

[–] atmorous@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

These current politicians dont know a single thing about what you said but I agree

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 8 points 6 days ago

And they will make sure to continue to not know a single thing about what was said. Ignorance isn't a valid legal defence, but it sure is a common deflection tactic these days. Law makers have a professional and ethical obligation to become informed on the issues their constituents care about, but it seems like it's rare to find one that remembers that obligation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 72 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"digital ownership must be respected"

gets into bed with Meta and OpenAI

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (2 children)

More proof that the current "Labour" government is in the pockets of rich companies and not on the side of consumers.

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If only that wasn't true if the other big parties as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 29 points 6 days ago

Such a brain-dead stance on the matter. Nobody is asking for your garbage DRM servers, we literally want the opposite of that.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hang on, arent these the same fuckers who greenlit AI training on IP they don't own?

[–] teuniac_@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sort of. But it's easy to understand their thinking.

A long time ago they were a left winged party. But nowadays they're so afraid of the far right that for each decision they ask themselves "what would people absolutely not expect from a left winged party? Let's do that!" Which has led to several more right winged policies than the previous right winged government.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I'm unconvinced anyone will really legislate this, and if it is, it'll just lead to that country being scratched off the list of where the game is officially supported.

Realistically, we need to stop buying online only games where the servers will eventually go offline, and support those that release open servers.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 11 points 6 days ago

The hope is that the EU will legislate it and not even apple fucks with the EU.

[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago

I stopped buying that stuff ten years ago. Indie games are always better these days

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

As long as the button says buy, then its ownership and should be treated like physical goods.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 17 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Vindication for bored ape NFT owners everywhere

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I mean... A large percentage of NFTs now link to nothing. Dead URLs. So the bored ape bros should actually be on the side of digital preservation & Stop Killing Games.

But considering 96% of NFTs are now dead projects worth nothing, the bored ape bros probably just want to forget about the whole thing and move onto the next get rich quick scheme.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] majster@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago

If you as a consumer want to own software FLOSS is the only option.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago

If I gotta pay IL sales tax on a digital game I better fucking own it!

load more comments
view more: next ›