this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
253 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

40503 readers
894 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

As someone who works in tech, I'm surprised it hasn't happened already.

Part of my job is to oversee and arrange in some capacity for licensing of digital products, especially office 365, and I can count the number of people who have a copilot subscription on one hand, out of nearly, if not more than 1000 users across various clients.

I know some are using competing products, mainly chat GPT, and I don't always have visibility to that, but still.... The rate of adoption and the speed at which all of this is being developed and invested into... Does not bode well.

[–] tangentism@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago

"It is very hard to time a bubble," Prof Admati told me. "And you can't say with certainty you were in one until after the bubble has burst."

No, we can definitely say with certainty right at this very moment that we're in a bubble.

[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

Bad for them. Fewer ai buttons shoved to my face, higher availability of GPUs, those ain't bad for me.

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The only way the AI bubble won't burst will be its complete integration into the military industrial complex and surveillance state, which is already underway.

AI traffic correlation for deanonymizing VPN users, ai tracking of all cellphone users across the US carrier networks, tracking of all people across all security cameras,...

This is just the beginning. And its all propped up by military spending from the US government.

"Data is the new oil" and all that? Is about undermining any 4th amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure. And AI is the latest (glitchy) tool to automate all of this.

But consumer facing side? Yeah, that's gonna burst.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

LLMs can't do most of those things and traffic analysis and other techniques already can but sometimes lack the data due to data sharing limitations.

You don't need GPUs to do traffic analysis you just need more Five Eyes, TIA, room 641A stuff.

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You don't need GPUs to do traffic analysis you just need more Five Eyes, TIA, room 641A stuff.

Oh, entirely. But that also theoretically benefits from AI: https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1546221824004636

Hence things like: https://mullvad.net/en/vpn/daita

But further? I'd encourage you to explore what Gospel and Lavender are.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Exactly right. Parent poster is conflating the investment in "AI" since 2022 (almost exclusively meant to mean LLMs, like ChatGPT) and specialized "AI" systems (almost exclusively "machine learning" systems).

A LLM is just about useless for any sort of surveillance or data analysis tasks. The bigger fear with LLM proliferation is as a propaganda machine, astrotufing the whole Internet with mass LLM-generated bullshit.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

someone on bsky posted that the gdp of the us only grew 0.1%without ai which basically means the entire us economy is dependent on ai which basically means the whole country is fucked

https://bsky.app/profile/realsporkman.bsky.social/post/3m2np4o5suc2w

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Welcome to most of the western world, stagnation!

Although most of us are stagnating on GDP/capita rather than GDP as a whole and prop up the GDP with immigration.

[–] bodaciousFern@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So which stock do I short sell - Nvidia, Oracle, or Microsoft?

[–] themagzuz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

unfortunately you can't really get rich from knowing a bubble will happen. things like shorting, put options, bear certificates, and etfs with inverse leverage either have terrible risk reward ratios (you can basically lose infinite money from shorting, that's what the whole gamestop/amc thing was about) or very bad long-term gains (bear certificates and inverse etfs usually only track day-to-day changes and generally fall in value when the stock they're tracking fluctuates in price).
of course, if you know when the crash is gonna happen, it's a completely different story. then you can buy shorts/puts/etc just before the bubble bursts and laugh yourself to the bank (assuming the firms on the wrong end of those assets haven't gone bankrupt, which is also a very real risk in a situation like this)

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

The challenge, as always, is to never underestimate a bubble's capacity to outlast your solvency. I personally know people who have been heading against the housing "bubble" in Canada bursting since 1999. They've spent a lot of money with nothing to show for it, yet, and missed out on housing prices, like, quadrupling? Quintupling?

So, good luck. Buying out-of-market puts might be a safer bet, since you're most likely to "just" lose all your money, with a small chance of a massive payout of it "properly" crashes.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Well, how to buffer a few hundred billions going up in hot air?

I honestly think that each stock purchase should require an appropriate deposit.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 105 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 19 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's likely going to take down whole companies if not countries.

[–] tangentism@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

Don't promise me a good time!

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 75 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Countries? Don't be ridiculous.

And any company that made itself so dependent on unproven bullshit kinda deserves it.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Companies, totally.

The only country it might take down is actually the US, as it might be the spark to start some shit in the current tense environment. I mean that I could see the bubble pop be Franz Ferdinand to a 2 Civil 2 War.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean, given that 1/3rd of the s&P 500s value is in 7 companies who are all heavily invested in AI compute.

I’m sure that the 10% wealthiest who’s consumption makes up over half of consumer spending won’t drastically cut back their spending if they lose a third of their wealth that’s in index funds.

And I’m sure private equity firms that are also heavily invested won’t start trying to liquidate their other assets at the same time.

No way this could see a massive decrease in consumer spending.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Evilschnuff@feddit.org 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Especially since ai is just treated as outsourcing 2.0

[–] fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago

AI - another indian

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Meh. Fuck em.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lowleekun@ani.social 63 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I hope that at least some rich people lose it all.

[–] bystander@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rich people (top 10-20%) are either financially smart or have financially smart people advising them. They will be well diversified in all asset classes. And will have a lot of liquid capital ready to buy after the bubble bursts. And also keep themselves fat and well fed. The wealth transfers up.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 1 points 1 day ago

You are of course right as enough market crashes and crisis have shown.

In the end it will have to be too miserable for a large percentage of the population with enough freedom to resist. Sadly governments everywhere are working very hard at mitigating the possibilities of resistance.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 54 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Vastly more poor people will be affected, and those rich people who aren't will just buy everything up on sale, further hoarding wealth.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 15 points 2 days ago

You don't have to tell me. What we have to do is eat those fuckers.

We all know the U.S. (put Germany in there too) is fucked beyond repair but revolution or civil war will have to wait until further suffering for the poor i guess. Nothing is going to happen until huge swaths of the middle class can't take it any longer and stop shielding the parasites.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'll likely "lose" some money from my index tracker funds when it happens, but bring it on. I know billionaires will lose a lot more than I will.

[–] FragrantGarden@lemmy.today 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not percentage wise though. Their money moves the markets and it'll be them getting out that tanks your index funds. They'll rotate into something else while you wait 8 years to get back to even because AI stocks were 40% of the market and what they run up next is only 5% of your portfolio.

It's got to be near a top, but news like this makes me feel like they're looking to drop the market for one more final push though.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I remember a VC guy during the dot com boom was saying they were just about to invest in another start up (following the same plan they'd been doing for a few at that point) and they got a call form upstairs telling them to pull out. The next day the bubble burst.

These bubbles burst not based on random chance. The big guys know the business isn't sustainable, but if they keep their money in it the shares maintain their value. Then one day they all pull out and pop! The bubble bursts. But they'll make money on that too by shorting everything.

They make money when the stocks go up and they make money when the stocks go down. And they have enough money to make those stocks go up or down.

[–] bodaciousFern@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Just like they did with Elon's jet, we need a live public tracker of Pelosi's stock purchases / sales so we can take the same actions apparently without any legal consequences 🙃

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

You could do this (there are websites you can find easily) but Pelosi isn't in power anymore and wouldn't be in the loop on Trump's corruption which is way more significant than just knowing which company the government is going to award a big procurement contract to or whatever.

The Trump corruption seems to have gone with crypto shenanigans and you can't track them. We just know that someone made >$100M by doing crypto shorts exactly one minute before Trump posted about more insane tarrifs on China, but there's no way to know who did that and we can't track them. They'll probably make similar amounts of money on the inevitable TACO.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Some people aren't mincing their words about it either, calling the deals "circular financing" or even "vendor financing" - where a company invests in or lends to its own customers so they can continue making purchases.

"Yes, the investment loans are unprecedented," Mr Altman told me on Monday.

But, he added, "it's also unprecedented for companies to be growing revenue this fast."

OpenAI's revenue is growing quickly, but it has never turned a profit.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

see, not a pyramid.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 days ago

The revenue is still less than that of Clash of Clans or Candy Crush. And it is mostly coming from the companies involved in the shell game as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] megopie@beehaw.org 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

All it takes is openAI or anthropic to run out of cash, then everyone providing them compute suddenly has giant power sucking white elephants that are basically useless for anything else (maybe crypto mining LMAO). And then they all stop buying more chips from Nvidia (you know, the company whose valuation is 8% of most index funds, and 80% of their revenue and all of their revenue growth over the past two years has been from data center sales).

Kinda crazy how 7 companies, all heavily invested in AI cloud compute, in one way or another, make up about a 1/3rd of the S&P 500.

I mean, good thing the AI bubble couldn’t possible pop any other bubbles. I mean, it’s not like nearly a decade of low interest rates could possibly have built any other bubbles in any other sort of asset markets.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wonder what the next grift will be. Maybe big money billionaires will technofy religion.

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Nah I'd put money on it being quantum computing. I think quantum has some neat applications, and the tech is cool as hell. But I think it'll be sold like "this is gonna instantly transform business overnight" and people will try to sell quantum computing power

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Given what Peter Thiel's been talking about lately, that's not all that far fetched.

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Let it burn! But after the bubble bursts the next Question will be: These idiots, like Sam Altman, Dario Amodel, Zuckerberg and Elon musk, do they get a juicy government bailout at the expense of the public or do they get punished for their stupidity?

[–] Sunshine@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago

Knowing corrupt Trump in power and aipac dems yes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All it takes is one major player to want their payout.

One. I will bet you anything it will be a bank or hedge fund.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] plyth@feddit.org 20 points 2 days ago

It's like the original internet bubble. The predictions are right, but not the timeline.

However, it's not decades but years until the predictions will be true.

load more comments
view more: next ›