this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
329 points (88.7% liked)

Not The Onion

18249 readers
2065 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 146 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Disclaimer: I hate this guy and all the stupid things he did in the past.

I don't understand the issue here. Assuming what he is telling regarding the safety features are true, this is not more dangerous than a stunt scene in a movie. If they had hired someone who is not a professional stunt man, I would classify this as 'dangerous'. But I can't really see the issue of shooting a 'stunt scene' with professionals, just like any action movie will do.

That said, I think this is just manufactured outrage, which will create more views for that video. Probably thile response to the video was underwhelming, and they wanted to drive up the views to ensure revenue.

[–] Carighan@piefed.world 37 points 3 days ago

Yeah the actual production here is us now talking about it. And well, the rest of the internet. The wanker is not stupid, I give him that. He must have known that just filming stunt scenes isn't good for clicks, but this is.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I've not watched the thing itself, but between the article and the screenshot the issue seems to be how it's presented.

It's not that the guy is actually in danger, it's that the content being made and the way it's framed is at best dishonest, and at worst promotes extremely dangerous behaviour to kids (who are very much his main audience).

It's unlikely that something with this kind of messaging would be allowed on regular TV, but because YouTube's approach to safe programming is pretty much arbitrary it's down to old fashioned journalism like this to flag up harmful shit like this.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 7 points 3 days ago

I was thinking the same thing. Sounds like they did exactly what any studio would do in a regular shoot.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago

My money is on Mr. Beast running a game show out of RFK's wellness camps. "Only one of these foul minorities will be allowed to be allowed to live, and will fight each other to the death to earn their life!"

He will live up to his name.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 62 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, YouTube recommended that video and I gave a fucking pass. I have no interest in watching a paid professional act like a desperate contestant degrading themselves for this dipshit's billionaire's petty cash.

[–] DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

hes a billionaire! from what what did he do for all this money

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

The same thing every billionaire did: He took it from other people.

[–] thelittleerik@lemmy.world 86 points 3 days ago

Stop giving this leech attention. This headline is manufactured for attention.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 45 points 3 days ago

Geez, I thought Squid Game was supposed to be a metaphor

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 88 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

I once posted a Youtube video from this man in my disability-focused community, in which he helped a lot of people get prostheses, because I thought was he did in his video was kind of cool.

I didn't know him back then. The post and the video got backlash I didn't expect.

Now I know him and I understand why.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 57 points 3 days ago

I remember, I called him a charlatan. I didn't fault you for not knowing, though.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 54 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (13 children)

Exploiting the poor for fame and fortune, and making it out as if he's charitable for doing it.

*It always surprises me the number of people that jump to his defense. Fucking weird.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] JohnnyCash@sopuli.xyz 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trapping people in burning buildings.

[–] chisel@piefed.social 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He trapped a professional stuntman in a burning building with a pyrotechnics crew, multiple fire suppression methods, and a professionally tested saftey system?

Wait until you hear about what Ridley Scott did to Matt Damon on Mars.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Wait. He really sent him to Mars for that movie?

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They're kidding. Men are from Mars, but once they leave, theyre never allowed back.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 73 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I’m so ready for the influencer era to be over.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 59 points 3 days ago (1 children)

“$1,000,000 if you let me stab you in the stomach five times.”

“Ok, I guess. My daughter has cancer, and this is the only way I can save her.”

* Stabs him four times. *

“Oh god, it hurts. Ok, I’m ready for the last one.”

“Nah, I think we’re good. So I’ll be keeping the $1,000,000.”

  • 1 trillion views on YouTube.
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 10 points 3 days ago

I see now the inflection point where reality meets Black Mirror scripts.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 67 points 3 days ago (1 children)

how in the fuck is this not the onion. he's just doing his own satire now

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, what’s the opposite of eating the onion? I read the headline and went ‘haha good one’ until I saw the community!

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

edged the Onion

just kidding, don't let me name things

[–] digital_man@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

rawdogging the onion. wait. no fuck you leave me alone. I DO NOT WANT TO FUCK ONIONS

[–] Mim@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

Alright, sure, onionfucker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 37 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Holy shit I thought this was satire until I saw bbc at the bottom what the fuck.

Edit: ah it's not that awful just a wild headline

[–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)

we are really getting dumber as a species.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 18 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Ouch my balls looks more and more appealing by the day.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago

I'll take a Full Body Latte

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

We've always been this dumb. Just look at the gladiators.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"We" didn't get dumb, dumb people got louder because of technology. They have been empowered with a megaphone with an entire audience of fellow idiots.

[–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

I'm pretty sure we're just getting dumber too.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

I guess he realised he fares better as a psychopath rather than a philanthropist?

he fucking what?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Must be a slow news day to report on a youtuber commenting on their own production of stunt videos with trained professionals

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Nope. This dribble is because they don’t want to talk about what’s really going on.

Portland, Chicago. LA. DC.

A senate that’s protecting a fascist kiddy-diddler, probably because they are too, while at the same time we have the fucking military invading our cities.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

A stunt man doing stunt man things? Lame

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"MrBeast tries to justify attempted murder" FTFY

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] elgordino@fedia.io 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This has ‘Late Late Breakfast Show’ vibes. Those around in the 80’s in the UK will probably remember the Noel Edmond’s variety show, a precursor to Noel’s House Party. They had members of the public do stunts. There were regular concerns about safety and eventually someone died.

https://www.everything80spodcast.com/the-late-late-breakfast-show-tragedy-of-1986/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Sociopaths aren't concerned about the safety of others.

[–] 100@fedia.io 9 points 3 days ago

this guy is extremely dangerous and will do anything for viral videos

How is he still active? Who is supporting this shitstain? Christ, the world is doomed.

load more comments
view more: next ›