this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
133 points (100.0% liked)

news

24380 readers
711 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image is of the Freedom Band performing at the end of the Second National Congress of the Socialist Movement of Ghana, sourced from this article. The same article contains most of the information used in the preamble below.


A little over a week ago, the Socialist Movement of Ghana concluded its second National Delegates Congress in Aburi, gathering 300 delegates from across the country. There, they deepened their commitment to the working class of Ghana and committed to intensifying political education and organization at the grassroots. The SMG itself decided to not electorally contest the 2024 elections in Ghana, but still presented a manifesto, and nonetheless managed to get two SMG members parliamentary seats in the National Democratic Congress.

Anyway, back to the National Delegates Congress: the delegates agreed that the Western imperialist system is now under a profound crisis, in which the likely future is a heightening of brutality, chaos, and resource plundering - a future which must be resisted and organized against.

To summarize their various statements and condemnations:

  • Inside Ghana: a commitment to women's rights, youth empowerment, and environmental protection.
  • A condemnation of the resource plundering of the Democratic Republic of the Congo by imperialist powers.
  • A salute to the people of Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso, in their campaign against outside imperial control in the Sahel.
  • A condemnation of Morocco's illegal occupation of the Western Sahara, and a call for the UN to identify the independence of the Sahwari people.
  • A strong condemnation of Israel's genocidal atrocities and massive terrorist operations against nearby countries, and support for Palestinian independence.
  • Support for the people of Haiti against outside imperial domination.
  • A call for the end of the blockade on Cuba and their removal from the State Sponsors of Terrorism list.
  • Solidarity with Maduro and the people of Venezuela against the United States.
  • A rejection of all imperialist aggression and sanctions against Iran.
  • A condemnation of NATO's decades-long military expansion eastwards towards Russia, especially as it has now resulted in massive devastation and risks a third world war.
  • And finally, a commitment to Pan Africanism and international solidarity with all oppressed peoples around the world.

A platform I think we all can agree to!


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 29 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

Short rant and some thoughts about the left and immigration:

I commented below in response to the post about Putin’s blaming “mass immigration” for destroying European culture, and thought maybe to expand a bit more from that comment.

It’s been a bit unsettling for me this week because of the overreaction spontaneously erupted on the Chinese internet regarding the K visa. As a country not known for its openness for immigration, for about an 48-hour window, this was perhaps the first time that many - based on an unsubstantiated rumor - have had to grapple with the anxiety of facing “mass immigration”.

Although I’ve seen widespread latent and casual racism and xenophobia over the years, especially against Indians, this is really the first time that such spontaneous eruption of anti-immigration discourse that occurred in a very organic fashion, when the “fear of mass immigration” is suddenly being perceived as real instead of something you’d never thought could happen in your country.

The short version is that China announced a new K visa for foreign STEM talents back in August that would be implemented on October 1st, without much attention paid to it. Then last month, Trump imposed a $100k free on H-1B, and Western media started reporting on how China is going to benefit from it, and pointed to China’s K visa policy.

Somehow, someone put the two together and just 2-3 days before the National Day when the K visa was due to be officially implemented, fearmongering rumors began to spread virally on Chinese social media, insinuating that how it opens up the floodgates for foreigners to enter China.

To be fair, the policy announcement appears half-baked without much detail about how exactly it is going to be implemented, so it leaves people more confused than ever. You can apply for the visa if you are:

  • 18-45 years old
  • Holds a STEM bachelors degree from a “renowned” school or work in a “renowned” institute
  • No language requirement
  • No employment requirement

The biggest problem here lies in what exactly is the purpose of the K visa?

I doubt any foreigner who don’t speak Mandarin Chinese semi-proficiently will ever get hired by Chinese companies because most of them are absolutely not equipped to communicate in another language. So, where are these people going to find work?

If we’re talking about foreign talents working in academia, then there is already an R visa “high-level foreign talents” for top people in the field, yet the simple requirement here is simply holding a bachelors degree.

Finally, if we’re talking about foreign multinational corporations that are indeed equipped to accommodate English speakers, then these companies have their own recruitment process, competitive application process and visa sponsorship, not to mention very limited spots usually only available for the top graduates.

As such, it is easy to see where there is plenty of room for imagination, and fearmongering conspiracies were abound, with plenty of comments like “I can finally understand what MAGA / rednecks (红脖子) are going through in their country”.

In general, the complaints took on a few flavors (cw: racism, obviously):

  1. More competition in the labor market - “we already have plenty of Masters and PhD graduates with couldn’t find jobs, why are we trying to attract more foreigners with only Bachelor’s degree?” - this is the one I consider to be the most valid criticism.
  2. Anxiety about immigrants flooding the country - “We don’t want low-quality (“inferior”, 劣质) foreigners to flood our country! Have you seen how Indians have built an entire industry of “fake qualifications” to game the Western immigration system?” - this obviously refer to Indians and Africans whom many only know of through the most uncharitable stereotypes propagated through online viral content and have never interacted with any of them in real life
  3. Anxiety about “losers back home” Westerners - “Who do you think are the foreigners (洋人) that would want to come here? Obviously those who are losers who could no longer compete in their own countries!”
  4. Latent sexual anxiety about foreigners coming in and marrying the local women - this really just follows an already intensifying gender discourse(TM) taking place since the past year, in a country where there is already gender imbalance, and an ongoing trend where marriage registration has been trending down and divorce rates have been trending up (apparently has a lot to do with economic downturn).
  5. It’s actually a backdoor for rich overseas Chinese who have emigrated to come back - this is, funnily enough, the most likely explanation for the government’s policy that has remained so obscure, but what do we know?

Nonetheless, the actual reasons are not important. What is interesting, and scary, is the overreaction against the perceived “threat” of mass immigration, which was likely a culmination of a combination of factors, including the precariousness of the average people who are anxious about the unstable job market and economic uncertainty, being persistently fed with widespread viral content that propagate the most uncharitable stereotype about other countries, as well as the intensifying antagonism between the sexes as less and less people are interested in settling down to raise a family.

Typically, as leftists, we would associate this kind of anti-immigration anger to be intrinsic to capitalist countries, because the capitalists want the working class to hate each other. But how can you explain the situation in China?

A point to make here is that there is also increasing cognitive dissonance between perceiving one own’s country to have become a great superpower with the many advanced technologies, surpassing even the West, yet at the same time they are working harder and longer hours than ever, no stability in the job market, wages are barely rising, quality of life is not improving, the house prices remain far out of reach, and there is a general pessimistic outlook for future.

To give you an example, imagine you went through your primary school in the 2000s, chances are in a few years, your parents would soon purchase a new house, one that would be a huge upgrade over your childhood home in some provincial town. Things look to be getting better by the day, and you dream about doing the same one day.

Then, you went through middle/high school hoping to score in gaokao to get into university, obtain a degree and get a nice paying job post-college, settle down and raise a family. There was already some alarming trend about the property market, and the house prices are starting to look a bit out of reach, but nothing too much to worry yet.

By the time you are studying in university, the property price would have peaked and plunged. It would have been a good thing if it weren’t such a drag on the entire economy, and you are suddenly facing a worse prospect that you never thought would happen growing up: unemployment, or the poor prospect of getting employed.

This is how fast an economic trend can go in China - what takes several generations of wealth accumulation to happen in Western capitalist countries, it can happen in 10-15 years in China. You are literally experiencing the rise and fall in real time, and there is obviously a lot of cognitive dissonance to take in.

Yes, the country is now a superpower. We have the most advanced 6th gen fighter. We have the best EV industries in the world. The best robotics and automation in industries. But - is that making your life easier? Why are you only getting two off-days per month? Why are you still being asked to work overtime by your boss every damn week? Despite being more productive than ever, why are your wages not rising?

All of this anxiety is being coalesced into a latent rage. It is perhaps not surprising that people would lash out when they hear some fearmongering rumor about mass immigration.

And I think there’s some lesson for the left here when it comes to immigration:

  1. You better make sure you can create a system with a robust social safety net, minimum wage, job guarantee, free housing and healthcare that are all sacred rights to the workers.
  2. You must be able to convince the people that they are getting the fair distribution of wealth in the economy that are in proportion with their labor.
  3. You must be able to convincingly demonstrate that you have the economic means to implement all these policies in a fair manner, and that foreigners seeking employment in your country is not here to take away the wealth and the fruits of their labor, nor are they here to drive down wages and cause competition in the labor market.
[–] ColombianLenin@hexbear.net 9 points 31 minutes ago

What's mostly disappointing from reading all this is the clear failure of Chinese socialist ideology in translating into proletarian internationalism. When you have a supposedly socialist society bitching about muh immigrants you have failed in trying to create solidarity between working class peoples.

This likely explains why the Chinese government has no intention of helping liberation or socialist struggles around the world (ie Gaza). The civil society in China don't really care that much any more than what the rest of the people in the world already do.

[–] Hermes@hexbear.net 8 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

What I don't get, is that China has both an unemployment and overwork problem. Surely, there is an obvious solution to this, what is preventing it from being implemented?

[–] Satanic_Mills@hexbear.net 3 points 14 minutes ago (1 children)

Export-led growth. Wages must be kept low to keep prices low.

The only solution to this is boosting the internal market, so the increase in wages is captured by the businesses themselves.

[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 1 points 31 seconds ago

Not the same if someone else says it, chances of a struggle session are lower.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 10 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 51 minutes ago)

The massive spike in anti Indian racism over the past year or so globally has been crazy to witness. It feels very artificial and almost "astroturfed", if I can even describe it that way. Quite sad that's now reached China. It's also very weird to me personally, because almost none of the racist stereotypes about Indians apply to the Indian diaspora where I live, whom basically have their own culture seperate from the "motherland" and seperate from the recent waves of Indian immigration to the west. Most of the Indians arrived over here well before the partitioning of India even happened and have lived here for centuries.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 20 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Hamas responded to the "peace plan", accepting to enter negotiations. I'm almost certain these will be rejected or destroyed by America and "Israel". The Hamas response states the need for Palestinian consensus for the interim governing authority, which the empire will never accept.

[–] redchert@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Its PR, Hamas is trying to become the "reasonable" party (well already is but global elite perception is different)

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 7 points 1 hour ago

Yes, exactly.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Reading the full statement, Hamas agreed to release all the Israeli hostages under the exchange formula in the Trump plan, and agreed to hand over civil governance of Gaza to the technocratic committee described in the Trump plan. But they want to negotiate on other issues such as disarmament and the further implementation of the plan, with a desire to participate in that.

Don't know if Israel and the USA will accept, but releasing all of the hostages and agreeing to give up civil governance are big concessions compared to a few months ago where only half of the hostages was what Hamas were willing to offer.

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 6 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

Didn’t trumps committee involve foreign governance, Tony Blair, etc?

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 2 points 21 minutes ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

The foreign "board of peace" (with Trump and Blair) "oversees and supervises" the technocratic committee according to the plan.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Don't know if Israel and the USA will accept, but releasing all of the hostages and agreeing to give up civil governance are big concessions.

IIRC they have accepted these in the past. They also required that governance proceed according to the democratic will of Palestinians, which the USA and "Israel" will never accept. If they sign this plan, they will violate it immediately, just like every other previous plan.

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 7 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Didn’t israel Katz say anything less than full acceptance is rejection? Just seems like rejection with more words, given that they stood firm on Hamas participating in the reconstruction government

full text"Out of concern to stop the aggression and genocide our steadfast people in the Gaza Strip are facing, and stemming from national responsibility and commitment to our people’s constants, rights, and supreme interests, the Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas has conducted extensive consultations within its leadership institutions, broad consultations with Palestinian factions, as well as discussions with mediators and friends, to reach a responsible stance in dealing with President Donald Trump’s plan.

After thorough study, the movement has made its decision and conveyed the following response to the mediators:

Hamas values the Arab, Islamic, and international efforts, as well as the efforts of US President Donald Trump, calling for an end to the war on Gaza, a prisoner exchange, the immediate entry of aid, rejection of the occupation of Gaza, and rejection of the displacement of our people from it.

In this framework, and in a manner that achieves an end to the war and a full withdrawal from the Strip, the movement announces its approval to release all occupation prisoners — both living and remains — according to the exchange formula outlined in President Trump’s proposal, with the necessary field conditions ensured for the exchange process. In this context, the movement affirms its readiness to immediately enter negotiations through mediators to discuss the details.

The movement also renews its approval to hand over the administration of the Gaza Strip to a Palestinian body of independents (technocrats) based on national Palestinian consensus and supported by Arab and Islamic backing.

As for the other issues in Trump’s proposal relating to the future of Gaza and the inherent rights of the Palestinian people, these are tied to a collective national position and to relevant international laws and resolutions. They will be discussed through a comprehensive Palestinian national framework in which Hamas will participate and contribute responsibly."

[–] sempersigh@hexbear.net 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago)

On the bright side western media is already running front page news that basically amount to “Hamas agrees to release all hostages and discuss handing over control to independent Palestinian body” when one glances at the story so if these headlines stick long enough it’s a good move since now news normies would see Israel rejecting the gesture out of hand as highly unreasonable

In the past Hamas has made conciliatory statements that were immediately interpreted by western msm headlines as “Hamas rejects ceasefire deal” so in terms of public opinion and consent manufacturing this is a good sign

Edit: trump is the wild card here he wants this deal because he has attached himself heavily to this one and labels it as a “trump deal” so he wouldn’t be happy with an outright rejection following this one since the media interpretation is already becoming established. (Even on foxnews.com the headline says Hamas agreed to release hostages as a part of trump proposed deal)

I suspect the Israelis will still attempt to torpedo this however but they may try to “humor” further discussion and just stonewall them during those so they can try and convince people Hamas still isn’t budging on anything.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 8 points 1 hour ago

Yes, I agree. It's clearly a response keeping in mind that the "Israelis" will accuse them of rejecting the proposal. They propose that they cannot speak for all Palestinians and further negotiations are necessary. They know, of course, that "Israel" never had any intent to make peace. They're going to have to lie and mislead in the media about the Hamas response, which they were also always going to do.

Both "sides" are talking past each other, because the occupiers have no desire for peace. These proposals are messages for the rest of the world.

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 15 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

The Invasion of Panama, Manuel Noriega and Venezuela:

Who was Manuel Noriega?In 1903, after Colombia refused to grant the United States the terms it demanded for a canal, President Theodore Roosevelt’s administration militarily backed a separatist movement. They wanted a nation whose primary purpose was to serve as a host for a strategic American waterway.

The 1903 treaty, signed not by a Panamanian but by a French lobbyist, granted the U.S. control over a ten-mile-wide strip of land, this became the Canal Zone, a segregated, American-run colonial enclave. The white American settlers, known as "Zonians" lived in a subsidized colony with their own schools, police, and stores, enjoying privileges denied to the Panamanians who lived on the other side of the fence. The Colombia diplomat at the OAS named the Zone Fence the "Berlin Wall of Latin America". The early Panamanian governments were little more than puppet goverments, content to manage the country for the benefit of a small elite while remaining subservient to Washington and the powerful Canal Zone authorities.

Decades of resentment and national humiliation boiled over on January 9, 1964. When Panamanian students attempted to fly their nation's flag alongside the U.S. flag in the Canal Zone, they were met with violence from Zonian settlers and police. The ensuing riots saw U.S. troops open fire on unarmed Panamanians, killing over 28 students and civilians. This event, known as Martyrs' Day, and caused a surge in Panamanian nationalism and made the return of the Canal an non-negotiable demand.

The goverment's failure to achieve sovereignty led to the 1968 Panamanian coup d'état, which, after a brief Junta, brought Colonel Omar Torrijos and his civilian allies to power. He established a left-leaning civic-military dictatorship that, while authoritarian, was deeply populist and nationalist. Investing in housing, education, and land reform, and brought poor working class Panamanians and minorities into positions of power for the first time. In foreign policy, he was anti-imperialist, offering support to left-wing governments and guerrillas like the Sandinistas in Nicaragua and challenging U.S. hegemony in the region. His singular goal was to reclaim the Canal, a feat he achieved with the signing of the Torrijos-Carter Treaties in 1977, which set a date for the final handover of the Canal to Panama.

In 1981, Torrijos died in a plane crash under highly suspicious circumstances. Many in Latin America believe he was assassinated by the CIA, which viewed his independent nationalism and support for leftist movements as a threat. His death created a power vacuum filled by his intelligence chief, Manuel Noriega.

Noriega was a very different leader. For years, he had been a key CIA asset and informant, a crucial link in America's covert operations in Central America. At the same time, he built a criminal enterprise, deepening his ties with drug cartels like Pablo Escobar's Medellín Cartel, a fact the U.S. was fully aware of and for years complicit in.

Manuel Noriega was a opportunist with no allegiance beyond his own power and wealth. For decades, he was a prized asset of the CIA, a useful strongman in a region Washington was determined to control. But Noriega was loyal to no one he played a dangerous double game, selling intelligence and services to both his CIA handlers and Cuba, profiting from the very Cold War tensions that ravaged Latin America. He also betrayed the Sandinistas in Nicaragua while posing as a fellow Latin American leader, Noriega actively sabotaged their popular revolution. He allowed Panama to be used as a conduit for the U.S.-backed Contras and provided intelligence to undermine the leftist government, all to curry favor with his bosses in Washington. He betrayed regional solidarity for personal gain, helping U.S. imperialism crush a genuine people's movement. Noriega was never a revolutionary or a nationalist.

By the late 1980s, the unpopular Noriega had become too public a liability and was becoming increasingly unreliable. As the U.S. turned on him, he went rogue, attempting to rebrand himself as a nationalist and "anti-imperialist" leader in the likes of the popular Torrijos. He created paramilitary units called the Dignity Battalions to intimidate political opponents and project an image of popular resistance against U.S. aggression. This crisis culminated in the 1989 U.S. invasion.

The InvasionIn March 1988, Noriega's forces resisted an attempted coup d'etat against his regime. As relations with the USA continued to deteriorate, Noriega appeared to shift his Cold War allegiance toward the Soviet bloc, soliciting and receiving military aid from Cuba, Nicaragua, and Libya. USA military planners began preparing contingency plans to invade Panama.

The situation escalated throughout 1989. After the October coup attempt against Noriega, led by Major Moisés Giroldi, The U.S. offered not a lot of support, ensuring its failure. As if the USA didn't just want Noriega gone, they wanted to manage his replacement and dismantle any vestige of an independent Panamanian military.

In response to growing USA. pressure, Noriega created the "Dignity Battalions," paramilitary units of civilian supporters, and postured as a nationalist standing up to American imperialism. In the May 1989 presidential election, the opposition candidate, Guillermo Endara, was recognized as the election winner by the US goverment. Noriega, unwilling to relinquish power, brutally suppressed the opposition and annulled the results. While an authoritarian act, this provided the U.S. with the perfect moral justification for an invasion it was already planning.

Cornered, Noriega made desperate gestures toward the Soviet Union and Cuba. This was less a genuine ideological movement and more a last-ditch effort to find new allies. For the USA this was a gift. It allowed them to dust off the old Cold War playbook and manufacture the fear of "losing Panama to the Soviets," a baseless but effective piece of propaganda for a public conditioned to fear communism.

The final pretexts were handed to the USA on a silver platter. On December 15, 1989, Noriega's national assembly passed a resolution declaring that a "state of war" existed with the United States. A day later, an incident at a Panama Defense Forces (PDF) checkpoint resulted in the death of an unarmed U.S. Marine, First Lieutenant Robert Paz, under really suspecious circumstances.

This was the spark the White House was waiting for. On December 20, the U.S. unleashed overwhelming and brutal force. The invasion targeted not just military installations but devastated civilian neighborhoods like El Chorrillo, resulting in thousands of civilian casualties that far exceeded the official U.S. count. While Noriega himself was deeply unpopular with many Panamanians who were tired of his corruption and repression, the invasion was a traumatic national wound inflicted by a foreign power.

After days of intense fighting, Noriega was captured and flown to the U.S. for trial. The most significant outcome of the invasion was not the "restoration" of democracy, but the complete dissolution of the Panama Defense Forces. With this act, the USA eliminated the only institution in Panama capable of challenging its control over the Canal Zone, achieving its primary strategic objective.

The U.S. installed the winner of the 1989 election, Guillermo Endara, as president. However, subsequent administrations under presidents Ernesto Pérez Balladares and Martín Torrijos (both from Noriega's own PRD party) were staffed with many of Noriega's former cronies and political allies. The invasion did not cleanse the alledged corrupt system, it simply removed an inconvenient leader and ensured the new power structure would be unconditionally compliant with U.S. interests.

Although we cannot rule out the possibility of a US invasion of Venezuela (especially since Trump became president), the situation is very different from that of Panama (a country that together with the US invasion of the DR in 1965, people like to compare to). For now, the US seems to want to continue pressuring Venezuela by attacking ships near Venezuelan-controlled waters, and Venezuela does not seem to be backing down at the moment. The same is true of Venezuela's regional allies, Colombia, Brazil, and Suriname, which have condemned the US presence in the region. We will see if the US attempts to attack a target within Venezuela and how the Venezuelan military and Latin American countries will react to this.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Has Mexico had much to say?

[–] Redcuban1959@hexbear.net 2 points 19 minutes ago

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum invoked her country's Constitution and the principles of non-intervention and self-determination of peoples when questioned about the US military deployment off the coast of Venezuela.

According to Reuters, three US warships equipped with guided missiles would arrive on the South American country's coast as part of an effort to combat threats from Latin American drug cartels, according to sources familiar with the matter. When asked at a press conference about this military deployment and relations between Venezuela and the US, Sheinbaum replied, “No to interventionism,” and also referred to other legal principles contained in the Mexican Constitution.

“It is clearly established in our Constitution and it is always our position: the self-determination of peoples, non-intervention, and the peaceful resolution of disputes,” she said, arguing that everything is always resolved through dialogue.

[–] Kieselguhr@hexbear.net 17 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Almost 20 years ago Zizek was my gateway to "Marxist" philosophy. Even nowadays, every 6 months or so I check out what is he up to zizek-fuck

It's incredible that someone could grift so long as a Marxist while being incapable of doing historical materialist analysis

It's indistinguishable from a Guardian/WaPo Oped

It’s no surprise that Trump has also suggested for Russia to rejoin the G7, signaling a broader re-normalization of ties. So, it’s not that Europe should unite to become one more major power within the BRICS space; rather, it should become an exception—a place that offers support to the victims of the new BRICS superpowers, each defining its own sphere of influence.

The announced American takeover of Gaza demonstrates what happens within a superpower’s sphere of influence.

Are you trying to pretend in 2025 CE that the neoliberal EU is not a satrapy of the US? Which Europe should unite? The neocon technocrats led by Von Der Leyen? Or the barely existing "Left"?

This brings us to the scandalous performance known as the Munich Security Conference. There, British historian Timothy Garton Ash raised the timely question: “Will the peace be like Chamberlain’s peace for our time?” My answer is that it could turn out to be even worse, because our time is one of a new BRICS multipolarity. Both prospects of peace in which Trump’s administration is now engaged—Gaza and Ukraine—are exemplary cases of how the emerging BRICS world will function: yes, it will be multipolar, but in the sense of a few strong states, each defining its own sphere of influence and limiting the sovereignty of its smaller neighbors. Trump’s foreign policy fully fits this BRICS model: he concedes that Ukraine lies within Russia’s sphere of influence, while insisting that Canada, Greenland, Mexico, and Panama belong to the U.S. sphere. The reality of BRICS thus uncannily echoes George Orwell’s 1984, set in a world divided into three superstates locked in constant warfare: Oceania, Eurasia, and East Asia. This world mirrors today’s reality with some adjustments: the United States conquers Latin America as Oceania, while Russia conquers Western Europe as Eurasia (except the UK, which remains part of Oceania).

That is why Trump immediately engaged in negotiations with Putin, openly excluding Europe from peace talks. Even when Trump and Putin disagree on many things, they already speak the same language. Putin’s (surprising, to some) endorsement of Trump’s plan to annex Greenland reflects their shared vision of a new world order. The two also share responsibility for major war crimes: in Gaza and the West Bank, and in Ukraine. However, China is an exception—it is far less expansionist, more interested in open trade, and seemingly better positioned to foster innovative capitalism (digital products, medicine, electric vehicles…). Although Europe is economically strong, it is becoming increasingly marginalized geopolitically, ignored more with each passing day. If the EU wishes to survive, it must assert its sovereignty forcefully—not just against Russia, but primarily against the United States.

Look at the actual numbers motherfucker! How many tons of steel produced by each power bloc?! Not fuckin GDP, but actual ammo?!

However, one should leave behind the rather boring enumeration of measures and focus on the ostensibly neutral terms like “common sense” and “sanity.” The problem here is that the era of common sense—when we could rely on traditional values and customs in daily life—is over, and not only in the domain of sexuality.

Alright, fuck you, you liberal hack

[–] Kieselguhr@hexbear.net 6 points 1 hour ago

The question looming behind all of this is: will Putin take the negotiations seriously at all, or are they just another step in continuous Russian expansion? The answer is not hidden deep in Russia’s soul; rather, it depends largely on how others will react.

very smart! Although... he seems to forget there's an aspect to wars that lies outside twitter and press conferences: the actual fucking battlefield where Russia is winning and Ukraine can't find enough soldiers even with force conscription

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 3 points 17 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

Trump has posted the full Hamas statement on the "Gaza peace plan" without comment on Truth Social.

Source link

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt is saying that Trump is recording his response to Hamas' "acceptance" of the plan.

Source

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 33 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

US Secretary of Defence/War Pete Hegseth just posted a video of another speedboat being destroyed by the US military in the counter Venezuela/cartel operation, the 4th publicly known video.

Video

Interestingly according to Hegseth:

The strike was conducted in international waters just off the coast of Venezuela.

If true, that would be well within range of Venezuela's air defences. Would explain F-35s being armed with weapons that can hit moving surface targets like speedboats in a stealth configuration. They can conduct strikes "against the cartels" without needing to suppress or destroy Venezuelan air defence systems.

[–] somename@hexbear.net 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They should drone strike the cartels by hitting Langley

[–] jack@hexbear.net 6 points 1 hour ago

Fort Bragg razed to the ground in devastating air raid by the US Navy

[–] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

So the US is wasting expensive F35 flight time on blowing up civilian speed boats?

[–] SummerIsTooWarm@hexbear.net 2 points 16 minutes ago

Well they are also murdering non-white people, so the F-35s are fulfilling their role as designed

[–] blurssr@hexbear.net 26 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The anti-China rallies in South Korea seems to have gotten really bad lately, they've been going on for a while but are now more extreme. Will this eventually blow over or will it turn into something worse?

[–] Test_Tickles@hexbear.net 22 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

What are they protesting? Isn't it the US trying to shake them down for hundreds of billions of tribute?

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 1 points 1 minute ago

If given the choice between living life as a medieval serf, under the US, or as a king, under China, there are those that would choose the US.

[–] redchert@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 hours ago

Easier to attack china than the empire.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 24 points 3 hours ago

always assume the worst when discussing the republic of samsung

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 31 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Man they got gen z running air defense

[–] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 17 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

They probably put millenials in charge of ninja looting those classified Israeli nuclear documents as if they were fucking up a 40-man Molten Core run. only-good-gamer

[–] mendiCAN@hexbear.net 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

my guild was dogshit at molten core it would take us like 3 hours

[–] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

yea Multiple wipes later and it's close to midnight, while most of us had to go to school or work the next day.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 33 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Jack Daniel's cuts off free cattle feed to Tennessee farmers after 45 years | NewsChannel 5

TL;DW: the distillery is ceasing a long-standing giveaway of their corn slop waste product to local ranchers and now they're crying because it will be sold to an energy producer instead

[–] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 2 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 17 minutes ago)

American Farmers are so coddled it feels like a parody.

The farmer in focus has thousands of heads of cattle and thousands of acres all without input cost.

They've been getting free animal feed for decades and when the spigot dries up they complain "noone is hearing our voices"

michael-laugh

[–] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 25 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

nobody wants to slop they cows anymore

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›