this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

3314 readers
30 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

James Reed, chief executive of Reed, told Times Radio that his site advertised around 180,000 graduate jobs three or four years ago, and this is now down to 55,000.

He encouraged aspiring families to encourage their children to look into manual labour jobs as AI increasingly automates aspects of white-collar roles.

"The direction of travel is what worries me. Some people might say, well, that’s your business. But every other business is saying the same thing, that far fewer graduate opportunities are available to young people,” he said.

But guess what's a few years away? Cheap humanoid robots powered by AI. So even the manual labor jobs will start shrinking. Approx 750,000 people in Britain have jobs that are primarily driving vehicles; self-driving vehicles mean their days are numbered, too.

What we aren't seeing yet is these facts seriously impacting politics. When will that happen?

Graduates face ‘white-collar’ recession in jobs market

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You know, I always envisioned a future in which machines would increasingly take over the dirty, dangerous or laborious tasks, leaving the rest of us to do the fun, creative work.

Only the tech-bro's could've managed to make a lucrative business model off turning the concept of a utopia on it's head. There's got to be a word for that, some sort of antonym of 'utopia', mmh, it's right on the tip of my tongue...

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

Sadly, we live in a society where being replaced by a machine is not a blessing but a threat though.

[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Lucrative? You surely mean VC investment fueled. AI companies are setting cash on fire each day to keep the hype going, there is no profit.

A good indicator is employees selling their stock options instead of holding on to them. You'd think they hold onto if AI was really the future.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 1 points 1 week ago

I meant "lucrative for the tech-bro's". That's emphatically not the same as "profitable".

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

Or -- hear me out -- learn things like differential equations and vector calculus, so you 1) actually understand how the machines work, and 2) have the ability to use them to help solve whatever challenges we collectively face

[–] plyth@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

What we aren’t seeing yet is these facts seriously impacting politics.

What else is chat control and age verification about? Politicians expect an unruly population.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Millions will die, that's what's going to happen. Meanwhile the rich and politicians will live in gated, guarded communities where they will never even have to lay eyes upon the dregs of society that we will become.

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Bourgeois who closed all the jobs: "it wasn't me it was AI"