this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
335 points (98.8% liked)

World News

49667 readers
2196 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 17 hours ago

Hey, psssst, US, are you watching this? Take notes please.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 187 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is not about social media bans, it's against the corrupt government. It's being reframed. If you think about it, if the only problem was social media ban, they'd just all get vpns. They're not stupid. They're trying to frame it as silly kids, (because they're all gen z and Gen alpha, in their school uniforms, so as to be less likely to be shot) who can't live without social media. But it's not, it's protesting deep government corruption. If word gets out that it's a protest against government corruption, other people facing similar oppression, may become emboldened, so it's being buried.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. Running the standard playbook. They wouldn't do it, if it wasn't so effective. Today they'd be calling the Boston Tea Party a bunch of anti-caffeine health nuts.

[–] zrst@lemmy.cif.su 1 points 19 hours ago

The American Revolution happened because colonizers didn't want to help repay Britain for its help in the French Indian War.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 173 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For anyone out of the loop (from the AP / quoted in the article) :

Why are people protesting in Nepal?

The demonstrations—called the protest of Gen Z—began after the government blocked platforms, including Facebook, X and YouTube, saying the companies had failed to register and submit to government oversight.

But they spiraled to reflect broader discontent about a lack of opportunities and corruption.

In particular, many young people are angry that the children of political leaders—so-called Nepo Kids—seem to enjoy luxury lifestyles and numerous advantages while most youth struggle to find work.

[–] Noerttipertti@sopuli.xyz 211 points 1 day ago

Cops firing live rounds at kids, killing almost 20 and injuring about 100 might have something to do with them snapping as well...

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 121 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Typical Newsweek, I've seen several people who have worked in Nepal say that corruption was spiraling out of control and people have been livid about it for months. The protests were already ramping up, which is why social media platforms were cut off, so videos about the corruption and investigations and means to plan protests were cut off. The "they didn't register in time" excuse is for the government to save face internationally.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago (12 children)

See this, you “No Kings” parade do-nothing virtue signalers?

This is “action.”

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bear in mind that the riot in Nepal only started after the peaceful student protests was shot at by the police first. The No Kings protest hasn't been tried to be violently quelled to warrant a public riot, yet.

[–] RealSpiderLane@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

This.

I’ve been saying over and over (down in that R-named shithole that banned me for a short comment approving of revolution,) some folks are gonna have to take a big L to kick it off here.

The first 50 or so Luigi’s will be dealt with harshly as examples; the public will buy the reasons fed to them and think of them as fucking monsters.

50 or so and people will start to take notice and see what needs to be accomplished here. Why do so many people hate CEOs? Hell, today, why would some “crazy person” want to hurt Charlie Kirk???

One more of that 50 got his metaphorical wings today.

Hmmm.

They’ll think, and think, and think. Eventually, watching this play out while food becomes out of their price range, their job replaces them with a TV screen of a Filipino lady, a small house hits an average of $500k in price, etc.

Something’s wrong.

Nepal got it, man. Enough people put their thinkin’ caps on and figured it out.

I went to Kent State from 2014-2017. Even met Dean Kahler at a memorial event; he was hit in the spine by a National Guard bullet and paralyzed, confined to a wheelchair for life.

America isn’t a bright place, intellectually. It’s gonna take cold, raw, painful time for enough people to figure out what is going on and the one way it can be solved.

That block of time, which we’re in right now, is gonna Fucking. Suck.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you sure this is the position you want to take?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I highly doubt the fascist tRUMP and his like-minded cronies give a shit about people waving signs once every few months or so.
Or any form of peaceful protests.
They are probably laughing their voluminous man tits off about it.

You'll need to either get violent.
Or shutdown certain systems, such as roads, on a countrywide scale for extended periods of time before they even think about giving a shit.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I will respectfully reject your suggestion to turn to violence and encourage others in this thread to also not be incited to do so.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Ha, there is no incitement because most americans are too complacent and mollycoddled to do anything. Maybe they'll go for a walk once every few months and wave a sign, but that's it.
The orange buffoon knows this, which is why he gets away with all his shit.

Anyways, what about the other option I mentioned?

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Your first proposal was to use violence, so let's explore that thought.

Would you take pride in living in a nation where political opponents are assassinated when half the country dissents? This doesn't sound like a better society than what we have today.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

And you are dodging the question even after I told you why I think mass violence will never happen.

"Would I take pride blah blah blah?"
That's, frankly, a daft question. No, obviously, I would not take pride in that.
Christ, no sane person would take pride in that. Silly.

However, do I think it is sometimes necessary, yes. Furthermore I think it was necessary for something (that's something. Not necessarily burning buildings etc) to happen in the us since around 2016, though it was demonstrably broken before, but I'll stick with 2016 as that was when the obese imbecile was first voted in.
"Why? Blah." you'll ask. It's because it is now blatantly obvious that if the us population will vote in a person so obviously corrupt AND so obviously compromised then the whole system is just totally broken, and needs a serious rethink.
Also the Bush jr presidency wasn't exactly great either. It was terrible for a lot of countries.

Anyways, again, what about the other option I mentioned?

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I strongly object to inciting violence, in particular strongly object to your suggestion that I, or others in this thread, should use violence against Donald J. Trump. It's absolutely not "necessary," as you've stated. Despite your attempts to change my mind, I wholeheartedly disagree with your position on using violence.

Peaceful protests and civil disobedience are perfectly acceptable and effective means of expressing dissent non-violently.

[–] Brutticus@midwest.social 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’re right, this is a half-measure. But I’ll be banned for speaking my mind, so we’ll stick with this.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Some of us can't do anything because we've got people depending on us to provide. Believe me, if there was ever a time where I could be more active, it would be right fucking now. But unfortunately, that kind of protest is the most I can do at the moment.

Put your money where your mouth is, go out and find those who are able to do more, and stop vilifying those who can't afford to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KatakiY@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Go do action then lmfao

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] mc900ftJesus@lemy.lol 93 points 1 day ago (19 children)

These protestors understand how change works. Good on ‘em.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 26 points 1 day ago

🤨

My mind immediately went there.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 14 points 1 day ago

Hoping France learns their methods in time for tomorrow's protest 🙏

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Russia and china do it better, they control social media behind the scenes, if you ban it its too obvious

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

That probably requires the kind of resources Nepal doesn't have

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] faizalr@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago

That is brutal.

load more comments
view more: next ›