this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
338 points (98.8% liked)

World News

49667 readers
2168 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you sure this is the position you want to take?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I highly doubt the fascist tRUMP and his like-minded cronies give a shit about people waving signs once every few months or so.
Or any form of peaceful protests.
They are probably laughing their voluminous man tits off about it.

You'll need to either get violent.
Or shutdown certain systems, such as roads, on a countrywide scale for extended periods of time before they even think about giving a shit.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I will respectfully reject your suggestion to turn to violence and encourage others in this thread to also not be incited to do so.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Ha, there is no incitement because most americans are too complacent and mollycoddled to do anything. Maybe they'll go for a walk once every few months and wave a sign, but that's it.
The orange buffoon knows this, which is why he gets away with all his shit.

Anyways, what about the other option I mentioned?

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Your first proposal was to use violence, so let's explore that thought.

Would you take pride in living in a nation where political opponents are assassinated when half the country dissents? This doesn't sound like a better society than what we have today.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And you are dodging the question even after I told you why I think mass violence will never happen.

"Would I take pride blah blah blah?"
That's, frankly, a daft question. No, obviously, I would not take pride in that.
Christ, no sane person would take pride in that. Silly.

However, do I think it is sometimes necessary, yes. Furthermore I think it was necessary for something (that's something. Not necessarily burning buildings etc) to happen in the us since around 2016, though it was demonstrably broken before, but I'll stick with 2016 as that was when the obese imbecile was first voted in.
"Why? Blah." you'll ask. It's because it is now blatantly obvious that if the us population will vote in a person so obviously corrupt AND so obviously compromised then the whole system is just totally broken, and needs a serious rethink.
Also the Bush jr presidency wasn't exactly great either. It was terrible for a lot of countries.

Anyways, again, what about the other option I mentioned?

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

I strongly object to inciting violence, in particular strongly object to your suggestion that I, or others in this thread, should use violence against Donald J. Trump. It's absolutely not "necessary," as you've stated. Despite your attempts to change my mind, I wholeheartedly disagree with your position on using violence.

Peaceful protests and civil disobedience are perfectly acceptable and effective means of expressing dissent non-violently.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’re right, this is a half-measure. But I’ll be banned for speaking my mind, so we’ll stick with this.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Some of us can't do anything because we've got people depending on us to provide. Believe me, if there was ever a time where I could be more active, it would be right fucking now. But unfortunately, that kind of protest is the most I can do at the moment.

Put your money where your mouth is, go out and find those who are able to do more, and stop vilifying those who can't afford to.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right. Nobody in history who ever fought a righteous cause had a family or anything to lose. They were all just Disney characters whose victory was guaranteed because they were the good guys.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Care to enlighten us about who your intended arson victims will be?