340
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
340 points (98.9% liked)
World News
49667 readers
2313 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
See this, you “No Kings” parade do-nothing virtue signalers?
This is “action.”
Bear in mind that the riot in Nepal only started after the peaceful student protests was shot at by the police first. The No Kings protest hasn't been tried to be violently quelled to warrant a public riot, yet.
This.
I’ve been saying over and over (down in that R-named shithole that banned me for a short comment approving of revolution,) some folks are gonna have to take a big L to kick it off here.
The first 50 or so Luigi’s will be dealt with harshly as examples; the public will buy the reasons fed to them and think of them as fucking monsters.
50 or so and people will start to take notice and see what needs to be accomplished here. Why do so many people hate CEOs? Hell, today, why would some “crazy person” want to hurt Charlie Kirk???
One more of that 50 got his metaphorical wings today.
Hmmm.
They’ll think, and think, and think. Eventually, watching this play out while food becomes out of their price range, their job replaces them with a TV screen of a Filipino lady, a small house hits an average of $500k in price, etc.
Something’s wrong.
Nepal got it, man. Enough people put their thinkin’ caps on and figured it out.
I went to Kent State from 2014-2017. Even met Dean Kahler at a memorial event; he was hit in the spine by a National Guard bullet and paralyzed, confined to a wheelchair for life.
America isn’t a bright place, intellectually. It’s gonna take cold, raw, painful time for enough people to figure out what is going on and the one way it can be solved.
That block of time, which we’re in right now, is gonna Fucking. Suck.
Are you sure this is the position you want to take?
I highly doubt the fascist tRUMP and his like-minded cronies give a shit about people waving signs once every few months or so.
Or any form of peaceful protests.
They are probably laughing their voluminous man tits off about it.
You'll need to either get violent.
Or shutdown certain systems, such as roads, on a countrywide scale for extended periods of time before they even think about giving a shit.
I will respectfully reject your suggestion to turn to violence and encourage others in this thread to also not be incited to do so.
Ha, there is no incitement because most americans are too complacent and mollycoddled to do anything. Maybe they'll go for a walk once every few months and wave a sign, but that's it.
The orange buffoon knows this, which is why he gets away with all his shit.
Anyways, what about the other option I mentioned?
Your first proposal was to use violence, so let's explore that thought.
Would you take pride in living in a nation where political opponents are assassinated when half the country dissents? This doesn't sound like a better society than what we have today.
And you are dodging the question even after I told you why I think mass violence will never happen.
"Would I take pride blah blah blah?"
That's, frankly, a daft question. No, obviously, I would not take pride in that.
Christ, no sane person would take pride in that. Silly.
However, do I think it is sometimes necessary, yes. Furthermore I think it was necessary for something (that's something. Not necessarily burning buildings etc) to happen in the us since around 2016, though it was demonstrably broken before, but I'll stick with 2016 as that was when the obese imbecile was first voted in.
"Why? Blah." you'll ask. It's because it is now blatantly obvious that if the us population will vote in a person so obviously corrupt AND so obviously compromised then the whole system is just totally broken, and needs a serious rethink.
Also the Bush jr presidency wasn't exactly great either. It was terrible for a lot of countries.
Anyways, again, what about the other option I mentioned?
I strongly object to inciting violence, in particular strongly object to your suggestion that I, or others in this thread, should use violence against Donald J. Trump. It's absolutely not "necessary," as you've stated. Despite your attempts to change my mind, I wholeheartedly disagree with your position on using violence.
Peaceful protests and civil disobedience are perfectly acceptable and effective means of expressing dissent non-violently.
Have you ever voted for him?
so with magic?
?
You’re right, this is a half-measure. But I’ll be banned for speaking my mind, so we’ll stick with this.
Some of us can't do anything because we've got people depending on us to provide. Believe me, if there was ever a time where I could be more active, it would be right fucking now. But unfortunately, that kind of protest is the most I can do at the moment.
Put your money where your mouth is, go out and find those who are able to do more, and stop vilifying those who can't afford to.
Right. Nobody in history who ever fought a righteous cause had a family or anything to lose. They were all just Disney characters whose victory was guaranteed because they were the good guys.
Care to enlighten us about who your intended arson victims will be?
Go do action then lmfao
By burning a woman alive? Why don’t you do it first yourself then?
"A woman" is woefully ignorant.
That's like saying Ghisleine Maxwell is just "a woman." It matters who that woman is.
I don't think there's a valid moral argument for burning anybody alive
Hard disagree.
Don't know that this lady deserved it, but some people sure do.
I would fucking love to burn Ivanka Trump alive. Fuck you, lib
Inciting violence again, huh? How much do they actually pay you?
Yeah, you’re right. Waving signs and voting will totally fix things in the US. Just usual GOP misbehavior, those wily scamps.
Go do something. Right now go do something you baby brained coward.
What's your deal?