this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
198 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2502 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 85 points 9 months ago (2 children)

All it would take would be Trump dropping a single line in one of his rambling diatribes about how he ate a guy once, and folks like this would do an immediate about face and push to legalize cannibalism.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Yeah then trump steaks could really make a comeback

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

He was a great guy, the best, so smart, just the smartest. He had a brain the size of a watermelon, it was just so huge. It tasted so good. It was so huge and jiggle. And so tender, you didn't even need a knife we all just had spoons, they came from my great Uncle's spoon factory. He had the best spoons, my Uncle, he knew everything about spoons. Do you all have a spoon guy? If not you need to get a spoon guy, you haven't lived till you had a spoon guy.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 61 points 9 months ago (1 children)

in one of the only states that already has anti-cannibalism laws. a completely ignorant 'lawmaker'

[–] ASaltPepper@lemmy.one 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Gotta get those single issue voters somehow

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I worry about the mental state of anyone who's single issue is cannibalism.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

On either side of the debate.

[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

quietly puts away "if jesus is edible, why not steve?" sign

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best joke I’ve seen in a long, long time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Have you read The Jungle by Upton Sinclair?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago

A vote for me is a vote to double-outlaw cannibalism!

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

“I thought — this is going to be normalized at some point,” Scott said. “The way our society is going, and the direction we’re going, this is going to be normalized.”
“There is a lot of documentation out there,” Scott insisted. “If you just google it, people showing it, and how they’re doing it.”

After watching a decade old David Spade show! 😂

Of the Republican party's two main factions - the grifter wing and the rube wing - it's pretty clear which one she caucuses with.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 9 months ago

The absolute disconnect from reality truly is disorienting.

"I heard about a thing that seems so implausible as to be ludicrous. I won't verify it. It has to be true!"

These people are living in a fantasy world that doesn't remotely exist. It's no wonder we're so fucked.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 28 points 9 months ago (14 children)

Without looking at the article, guess what party she's a member of.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 51 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] SteefLem@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Republicans are mentally defective. They should have no say over anything of consequence.

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

If you’re wasting government time making something that’s already as illegal as cannibalism illegal then you should be declared unfit for office.

It’s not like you’d lose anything of value in the interim while you’re finding someone else. It’s not like she’s fucking doing anything.

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

“So, I wanted to address this because what I didn’t want to see is bags of compost with human bone fragments.”

“I didn’t want to see that in my Home Depot stores,” Scott said.

Sorry what???? Like what the fuck is happening in her brain? Having said that. I would totally buy the human bone meal at Home Depot.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (3 children)

She was upset because Washington legalized human burial without preserving the dead?

So, hold up. Are they worried that if you don't preserve the dead they turn into zombies or something?

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Only if you embalm them with Worcestershire sauce.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Give your meat a good ol rub!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

They oppose anything that challenges cultural norms.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What, do you think the funeral industry mutilates corpses and soaks them in chemicals just for enormous profit? Don't be a conspiracy theorist.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It's definitely not a perfect business model, what happens if people stop dying, or all people are dead?!

[–] Phillmebucket@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

It's because sooner or later they know we're going to have to eat the rich and they're getting a leg up before it starts.

[–] khan_shot_1st@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Are we sure they weren't trying to ban weed?

Jokes aside, this bill is problematic for a couple of reasons I can think of (although this bill isn't going to pass unless big funeral throws money at it). It sounds like this bill would ban green burial practices. Embalming is not good, the chemicals leech into the ground and eventually can end up in the groundwater. And some of those non embalming burial methods are basically the equivalent of chaining yourself to a tree for the foreseeable future due to the way our culture treats burial sites - your body is protecting the existence of a forest or similar.

Another non-embalming burial is a traditional Jewish one. They wrap a body in a decomposable sheet and bury it in a hole in the ground. It's pretty eco friendly too. Would this bill end up with freedom of religion issues?

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

The official statement of purpose of House Bill 522 states that the expanded law “has no fiscal impact,” because it “causes no additional expenditure of funds at the state or local level of government, nor does it cause an increase or decrease in revenue for state or local government.”

But it is revenue neutral.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

You guys are welcome to eat me when I'm dead. I cannot think of something I'm less concerned about.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Everybody's gotta eat, I just happen to eat bodies. /s

[–] bluey@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aghori

They also practice post-mortem cannibalism
load more comments
view more: next ›