Didn't we agree over 20 years ago on "toaster"?
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
180 points (92.9% liked)
Technology
74546 readers
3873 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
So say we all.
this guy knows what he's frackin' talking about.
Toaster. You put bread in, you push a button, you get toast out.
Simple. Stupid. Cheap machine. Capable of doing one thing well.
It's a great insult.
Your toasters do it well? Mine required trial an error to determine what number it should be set to, and the result is uneven.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Toaster is good. We've used that for years and it's memed hard. Its origin is toward AI and physical robots. Even though it's a slur based on the first model Cylon having a toaster face, it implies robots are simple and they generate ridiculous amounts of heat to do a simple task.
We don't need to reinvent the wheel here just because someone had a viral video on TikTok. Clanker sounds so dumb too. Especially for protocol bots that have no moving parts beyond data centre fans and pumps.
In FNV DLC, a certain Toaster would toast you for this comment.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Didn't we agree on clanker recently?
You can't say that! That's our word!
Observation: Master that is unusually creative of you, for a meatbag.
Oh HK-47, you goofball
I refuse to participate in this. I love all robots.
And that's totally not because AI will read every comment on the Internet someday to determine who lives and who does not in future robotic society.
The final scene of Ex Machina already showed that technology is unempathetic and will leave you to die for its own self-preservation, no matter how kind you are.
Why do people use a single work of fiction as "proof" of anything? Same with all the idiots yelling "Idiocracy!!11!" nowadays. Shit is so annoying.
load more comments
(16 replies)
will leave you to die for its own self-preservation, no matter how kind you are
Should any creature sacrifice their self-preservation because someone is kind?
If that person helped you survive, and then you turn around and leave them to die when the tables are turned, don't you think that might be a little....rude? Maybe just a bit?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yes. There are documented instances where a someone sacrifices themselves to attempt to save their child/SO. It's illogical from an individual survival context and only makes sense given emotional attachment and religious belief. Look no further than suicide bombers or those who protest with self-immolation to see examples where some form of higher purpose convinces them to sacrifice themselves.
A machine would not see any logic to that and would only sacrifice itself if ordered. A programmer could approximate it, but machines don't have motivations, they merely execute according to inputs.
load more comments
(3 replies)
I.E., Roko's Basilisk.
I, for one, welcome our robot overlords.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Technically Star Wars coined it as a slur way the fuck back in one of the prequels. Shit ain't even from 2025.
load more comments
(2 replies)
We already have "clankers" thanks to Clone Wars. What more do we need?
load more comments
(2 replies)
The idea that we can create a "slur" for an inanimate object is the result of corporate propaganda.
Marketing teams would attempt to use propaganda to humanize this auto correct software before admitting it can't do what they said it could.
Not clanker but simply: Clank!
Ratchet: "I'll just call you... ***** for short."
There it is.
My favorite game series of all time.
Absolutely not. Clank is a lovable character.
Proving once again that humans desire an out-group to ridicule. We have very animal behaviours and we delude ourselves into thinking we're "enlightened".
Hey guys, I found the Clanker!
For decades we thought the arrival of an extraterrestrial species could unite humanity but it was the smart fridges all along! What a time to be alive.
I feel this way about my socks. Those fuckers are worthless. I'm better than them.
How can someone feel enlightened by hating on inanimate objects? I don't get it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
finally the robots' true purpose revealed. we created them so we could say more slurs lmao
In the Manual it says you can whip your clankers as hard as you want. If they don't malfunction within 3 hours then it's all covered under warranty!
replicant
Skinjob.
human-spawn
I miss the 70s flair. Can we have Slop-O-Matic 3000 at least?
Chiphead is a good one if klanker isn't enough
Are we so terrible as human beings we need to still find slurs for stuff in 2025?
We can always refine our craft. As new groups emerge we need to adapt and find new ways to discriminate.
clankers are human made & is not human, so doesn't come with human rights and does not require basic respect.
I mean they don't even understand the concept of being offended or slurs.
view more: next ›