These claims often come with limited significance. ChatGPT also supposedly passed the bar exam in early 2023 and all kinds of benchmarks. Yet it still messed up my fairly simple emails, couldn't do other tasks back then and to this day it often even fails summarizing random news articles and doesn't get the gist of it. These claims make good headlines, but that's pretty much it. And it's really hard to come up with meaningful benchmarks.
Futurology
Yeah, when I read that, I decided to ask it a few bar exam test questions that you can find online. It scored worse than my guessing and I'm nooooot a lawyer.
It all reminds me of how everyone made a huge deal the first time a human beat a horse in an endurance race...
Which, used to be a normal thing. People would run races and for an advertisement it was "try to beat a horse".
People noticed what conditions led to it being closer, and the closer it was the more attention your event got
So people kept fine-tuning those conditions until they came up with the exact right scenario a human could outrun a horse.
But a horse is still faster 99.99999% of the time.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_versus_Horse_Marathon
So yeah, if I had billions of dollars in VC capital on the line, I could design a test that shows AI just broke an important milestone and there's no better time to invest in AI....
But that doesn't mean it is, just that I have a financial incentive to convince you that's true.
VC are like the guys who think every stripper loves them cuz they got a fake phone number one time 20 years ago.
Sam Altman is a conman isn't he?
More likely believes in the con himself. All these rich people are convincing themselves that it just needs "a bit more" when the reality is that an LLM is closer to t9 text prediction than it is gAI from sci-fi. The gAI they want needs a different paradigm of computing few if any AI researchers actually believe that increasing the size of datasets/training will result in a gAI.
A similar thing occured in genetics, we had the whole thing about sequencing the whole human genome and then about sequencing populations/the world. And while these sequences and analyses have been very helpful the data can not given a full understanding of genetics regardless of how many people you sequence. Updated analysis algorithms can do better than early stuff but they still won't understand the human genome.