this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
441 points (94.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32423 readers
3590 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Queer and straight don't really work imho.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago

Meh... I think it works, but they're by far the weakest here.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Straight works better, but it expresses a spectrum. This is often described as being oriented close to you while that is described farther. Straights are fucking what's father away from their gender.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wouldn't Bisexual be fuck him and fuck her, otherwise it would be Pan? Idk I thought I was finally understanding but this graphic confuses more now.

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In theory: Bisexuality is attraction to more than one gender, while pansexuality is attraction regardless of gender. For example a bisexual person could be attracted to women and nb people but not to men.

In practice: Mostly synonyms, some years ago 'pansexual' was kind of a buzzword to mean 'inclusive bisexual' (as in can also be attracted to trans and nb people), but I haven't met a bi person that wasn't 'inclusive' or that wasn't attracted to a particular gender like the example above.

[–] HellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Then wouldn't the "in practice" inclusive bisexual people be pansexual by definition

[–] rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

People don't label themselves according to rigid definitions.

  • signed, an inclusive bisexual who does not identify as pan
[–] HellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm confused and I don't know how to ask questions about this topic without sounding like a mouth breather, I'm sorry for my autism: why label yourself at all then if there's no rigid definition?

Wouldn't it be easier to have no label rather than a label whose definitions do not fit you? My spouse is pansexual and doesn't enjoy when people lump pansexuals and bisexuals together. I admittedly don't understand entirely why and would like to hear from somebody bisexual who has an opposing opinion on that so I can better understand

I mean this with no judgement and much curiosity

[–] rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, I'm happy to clarify.

The way I understand it, "bisexual" is a very broad term that encompasses all people who are attracted to people of the same (or a similar) gender as them and also to genders different than their own. That is the "bi" in bisexual, both homo and hetero, not attraction to men and women. Under this definition, pansexuals are a specific type of bi that are attracted to people equally, regardless of gender. There are other microlabels that fit within bisexual too, some of which might better fit how I experience attraction, but this is where we get into the function of a label.

Labels exist to convey general information in a concise way, without having to explain things all the time. Under the bi umbrella, there are only two terms which the average person who's aware of the LGBT community might have heard of: bi and pan. Thus, unless you want to constantly have a definition at hand or send people to the wiki, you are heavily incentivized to use one of those terms. Having no label would be even worse, since then you would need to give a whole spiel every time you're asked. It's ultimately a pragmatic decision to use a term that more people recognize over one that might be more "technically correct."

So, constrained to either bi or pan, I think bi is the more appropriate term for me. Sometimes I feel equally attracted to all genders, but my preferences towards similar and different genders shift back and forth, often being heavily favored in one direction or the other. So I use the broader term of bisexual to encompass the full spectrum of my feelings on the matter.

Hope that helps!

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

I probably fit the "inclusive bisexual" definition better but prefer the label pan. I also like the bi flag better so if I'm ever throwing a flag up it's usually bi lol. I use pan because I'm agender and it feels kinda weird to say that gender is something I care about when it isn't, but I find myself more attracted to people that present either androgynous or feminine, but not really masc (except for the ladies sometimes). All that to say, these labels are basically pointless and only serve to (poorly) provide a surface level summary of whatever the hell is going on in our heads

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

The other commenter gave you the right answer already. But I meant 'in practice' literally, as in, if the sexuality of someone matters to decide your course of action, like flirting with them or introducing a friend, they basically mean the same.

Now if you wanted to get technical, pansexual people are technically bisexual (?). Pansexuality would be a special case of bisexuality in which the attraction is equal across the entire gender spectrum.

But as rarWars said it's hard to put identity into strict rigid definitions. If you think it too hard this model means that every sexuality is just a special case of bisexuality as well, ace is a special case of pan...

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

The old definition of bisexual is attracted to both men and women. The more correct definition is attracted to more than one gender. So saying "fuck him and fuck her" is limiting to two specific genders and not reflective of what bisexual is.

Clue is in the name. Bi-sexual. Two-sexual.

[–] growsomethinggood@reddthat.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bisexuals aren't exclusively attracted to men and women, nonbinary and agender folks are largely included. Common interpretation of the bi=2 prefex is including 1) same- (homo) and 2) different- (hetero) gender sexuality. Colloquially the difference between bi and pan is usually described as bisexuality allowing for preference for certain genders but not exclusively so, while pansexuality is attraction regardless of gender. A given bisexual might be attracted to twice as many women as men, but that doesn't mean their attraction to those men isn't real, you know? Meanwhile a pansexual could have attraction to the exact same people but wouldn't ascribe it to gender, just individuals. Largely the difference between the two is therefore personal preference in how someone experiences their sexuality.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Meanwhile a pansexual could have attraction to the exact same people but wouldn’t ascribe it to gender, just individuals

Thanks, that's the first explanation of the difference that's actually managed to reduce my confusion.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] myotheraccount@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Is it you, J.D.?

[–] BambiDiego@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Incel: Fuck off

Cropophiliacs: Fuck this shit

Autoerotic: Fuck me

BDSM: FuCk YeAh...

Religious: Holy Fuck

Sexting: Duck

[–] Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 week ago

half of it seems to be the same

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Clumsy: Fuck...

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] halvar@lemy.lol 3 points 1 week ago

Why 'Fuck that'?

[–] mordoko@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

it seems i dont have fucks to give

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago