this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
-2 points (44.4% liked)

Futurology

2579 readers
295 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fail to see how regurgitation machines prone to hallucinations can improve something as complex as society.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Failure to see it is common amongst us limited humans.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't need a multi-billion-parameter neural net to know that a multidimensional map of human language use isn't going to revolutionize society.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you and i can now see that putting transistors in machines give them more functionalities. The same way i bet that, in the future, robots using artificial neurons, in ways we can't describe yet, will exhibit potential you and i "fail" 😋 to see now

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago

Don't misunderstand, I think that actual AI is as inevitable as simulating scanned human brains, but large language models are neither artificial nor intelligent. They are statistical maps of human writing, interesting from an academic perspective but not actually useful for anything.