this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
-2 points (44.4% liked)

Futurology

2579 readers
307 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_A@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Failure to see it is common amongst us limited humans.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't need a multi-billion-parameter neural net to know that a multidimensional map of human language use isn't going to revolutionize society.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you and i can now see that putting transistors in machines give them more functionalities. The same way i bet that, in the future, robots using artificial neurons, in ways we can't describe yet, will exhibit potential you and i "fail" 😋 to see now

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago

Don't misunderstand, I think that actual AI is as inevitable as simulating scanned human brains, but large language models are neither artificial nor intelligent. They are statistical maps of human writing, interesting from an academic perspective but not actually useful for anything.